D_Air1

joined 4 years ago
[–] D_Air1@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 day ago

I used them for some things, but other things still don't work quite right. Take Steam for example. I do love flatpaks for testing out apps, things with really finicky dependencies, or pinning a specific version of a software that I want to continue to work in the future. However, for most things, Arch + AUR just covers all my needs without any hiccups.

To me flatpaks are sort of like NixOS. All the benefits they provide aren't something I need on a daily basis. Rolling back works just fine 99% of the time with downgrade. I already have system backups. Despite what some articles might insist, things don't just break all the time. I'm not running untrusted software.

Basically no solution is perfect, but they don't need to be. If the benefits I gain can be recreated through other methods without the tradeoffs they introduce, then I will go with that. Of course, that isn't to say they don't have their place, but sometimes I feel like some people think that "being designed from the ground up" to handle certain use cases is always better than whatever "cobbled together" thing we currently have and that isn't always the case. I'm specifically quoting those two phrases because these are the exact phrases you will hear projects using to justify their existence. In fact, I would go so far as to say that some people have outright confused modularity for "cobbled together".

One last example I want to make is that I make use of projects like the fish shell and helix editor. In these cases, I find the features they introduce to be worth the tradeoffs and work better because of being designed "from the ground up" to do what they do. However, I don't make use of immutable systems, containers such as docker, or say filesystems such as btrfs. The features they provide are not useful enough to me compared to the problems they introduce.

[–] D_Air1@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 day ago

Nope, but I'm on Arch with Plasma 6.4.2

[–] D_Air1@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 week ago

Maybe pipewire and the ROC protocol? I'm not sure if it can be used on windows. You will have to refer to their documentation to get anything working. On Arch the package is called pipewire-roc. On Android the app you will need is roc droid. I have used it from linux to android, but have never introduced windows into the mix.

[–] D_Air1@lemmy.ml 6 points 3 weeks ago

Well she was right. I did learn something new about those commands.

[–] D_Air1@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 month ago

I've been using some ancient java app called jmkvpropedit to do this.

[–] D_Air1@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 month ago

Depends on how the project and how long they have been around.

[–] D_Air1@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 month ago

At least I don't need to pay for freeware. Last I checked, the cost of Windows was included in my laptop and I didn't get the option to not install an OS even though I fully intended to install Linux on it.

[–] D_Air1@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 month ago

That was my first thought as well. I understand the reason for the change and don't mind it, but how do I copy the url which is far more important to me on a day to day basis than refining my search. Normally the query is still visible at the top of the web engine search page anyways.

[–] D_Air1@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 month ago

About the time that Windows 10 came out. I was just messing around and ended up liking it.

[–] D_Air1@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

A contract they will try not to honor at every turn at that and if they do for the least amount possible.

[–] D_Air1@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 months ago

I'm constantly surprised at this point how anyone fails at it. Not to mention there are a number of distros that provide them out of the box now and somehow people still say they couldn't install it.

[–] D_Air1@lemmy.ml 74 points 2 months ago

Finally time to bust this out again.

view more: next ›