I think you're letting your own biases blind you. I'm not going to defend Notch or anything like that (and Musk can gargle a 50' golden cock and balls, for the record) but I'd consider myself to be quite in the loop about the general happenings in the gaming world and still didn't know about this shit so I don't think it's unfair to assume the average consumer is going to know too much more than "creator of one of the greatest games of all time supports game ownership. Cool!" and likely not read any further than that because we're still talking about people on the internet. So yes, I do think it's an advantage to have a headline like that. And for the smarter people who understand the world is full of nuance, we see an alt-right fascist expressing a surprisingly left-leaning ideology.
DebatableRaccoon
joined 2 years ago
FG's installer has a RAM limiter option, correct.
Maybe so but the more big-name supporters of the concept of owning ones games, the better. Not to mention the juxtaposition of his other views from what I've been seeing from him adds to the absurdity of the concept of not keeping what you pay money for.
Even a broken clock is right twice a day.
As opposed to those dry showers. I hate those.
Right, hands down.
Despite the fact that limiting liability is exactly what the EULA does. You don't get to have it both ways, corpo scum!
No Forza game on the Horizon... Heheh
Oh no, I feel so bad that it would remove their choice to steal from their customers. Moving on.
6, she looks nice. How's that answer?
Of course not, that'd be madness!
view more: next ›
Nor will I adhere to it.