A growing web of hundreds of billions of websites, more data than even 100,000 of the most expensive iPhones mashed together could possibly store.
Should I read the rest of the article after stumbling upon this idiotic comparison?
I have a Fitbit Versa with internal storage for music. The only way to get music onto the device is via the desktop app. The app cannot be downloaded anymore and it cannot be started because the login servers were shut down...
Guess I'll never buy a google product again.
While it's easy to prove rigorously I think the easiest way to think about it is to think what number/numbers could go between 0.9 repeating and 1.
I guess that it also requires a second thought experiment that if no numbers can go between two numbers, those two numbers must be the same.
edit: this might be even easier:
1/3 = 0.333... -> multiply both sides by 3
3/3 = 0.999...
1 = 0.999...
an option that should not be considered = not optional
they probably have an understanding of physics we don't currently know about in the wider public.
I don't believe any secret agencies have a better understanding of fundamental physics. They have better technology and engineering.
Guys, do we really need clickbait headlines from poor sources like politico?
This looks like a 15 year old game.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VNP4Sx3PtQI
This is a BF3 video from 12 years ago
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-FktL2pu2wE
I didn't read the article but does it say anything about detectability? If I claim I created it who can prove an AI did?
YSalsoK that many sites block these email addresses when trying to sign up. especially the bigger providers of such services.
i hear the people who created meth made a new drug. might try it for fun/curiosity...
Let's say your great-great grandfather stole bricks from a victim to build a factory that you now own and that provides a nice living. Because of that the victim was not able to build a factory and their descendants are poor.
Let's say this crime is very well documented.
Did you do the crime? No. Are you reaping the benefits of the crime? Yes.
Should you give that factory to the descendants? Should you be required to help the poor descendants? Would it be a nice gesture to help the poor descendants?
Nobody is asking for the factory. People are asking for a bit of help because it's clear that you are still reaping the benefits of a crime that was perpetrated by an ancestor and the victims descendants are still feeling the repercussions of that crime.