[-] Dragonish@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 3 weeks ago

Welcome! Without buying more enclosures and increasing the number of drives you can access at one time, you will need to partition your files based on your own use case and maintain an index so that you easily can retrieve the right drive when you need to access data. Perhaps you get a drive for each year. Perhaps images go to one and video to another. perhaps you split on the file name. For an index, this can be as simple as labeling the drives and putting them on your shelf. As mentioned by others, there are software solutions for indexing file metadata as well.

If you buy more enclosures you can use MergerFS or another union file system to bring both disks together and provide a single view while using ext4 for each drive. This allows you to easily remove a single drive and plug it into another basic linux distro, but you will not get any data striping or other protections. So if 1 drive dies, you will loose whatever data was stored on that disk. Because of that, I advise you to still think about partitioning your files even if you union them so that you understand your failure scope.

[-] Dragonish@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 5 months ago

Well you know if only they were wealthy enough to become a vegan in the first place they could buy the good looking carcasses the mean Vegans are making them eat! /s

[-] Dragonish@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 5 months ago

I am a fan of structurizer and the C4 model in general.

I would use a single .dsl file and add the relationships and entities as you discover them. You can apply tags , and then write filtered views to only show specific tags for sub systems or workflows that a user will follow.

you can pair this with markdown/text notes that reference the png files of the views that structurizer will output.

[-] Dragonish@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 6 months ago

I am interested in reading more about what Tezka means. Please do share.

I think i can relate to your goals and am personally focused on similar work in an effort to make my own life a little more bearable. my efforts are more focused on executive function and how to integrate this into my life seamlessly vs llm/conversational ai. i have been playing around with conversational ai, but i currently lack the psychological understanding which is needed to do this right. i look forward to hearing more from you.

my immediate (ok, i have been working on this all day) thoughts

  • as other have mentioned, i like quirky. I would want them to show some flaws. idk what exactly, but i think it would be off-putting to be overly clinical or "perfect"
  • i would be more comfortable interacting with Tezka in a more private environment such as a matrix room vs a more public comm like this.
  • i like the "relational repair" aspect. my own shortcomings here is something that has been made much clearer to me recently. I imagine them asking me if i have reached out to my relations, and give me some personalized advice on how best to approach the person. If the interaction with the person did not go well, then i imagine them helping me through it in a positive way, preparing me to try again next time.
[-] Dragonish@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 year ago

VS Code's extension system makes it pretty easy to build your own code snippet extension. I use my own private extension to easily "generate" different types of markdown files (ie readme vs a troubleshooting guide) from my personalized snippets.

view more: ‹ prev next ›

Dragonish

joined 1 year ago