DulyNoted

joined 2 years ago
[–] DulyNoted@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago

That's fair, but also, the fact that it has procedural generation should not be a surprise to anyone at this point, they were very open about it.

I'm just hoping there's an easy way to distinguish in game between the procedural stuff that's not worth exploring and the stuff that is. I'm hoping it can be safely ignored, but it WILL be annoying if they hide really interesting questlines on otherwise barren planets.

[–] DulyNoted@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

There's quite a wide range of reviews. I tend to trust the ones who talk about how much fun the side content and faction quests a lot more than I trust the ones that were underwhelmed by the main questline. I've been playing these games since Oblivion and the only main questline I ever finished was Fallout NV.

[–] DulyNoted@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago

Not really the same type of game at all. Elite is a fun simulation but there's essentially no story.

In the same way, I'm sure the space combat will be fun in Starfield, with essentially no depth.

[–] DulyNoted@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

All of the most positive reviews I've read have been at 80+ hours. Still finding new things to do, which is a good sign.

[–] DulyNoted@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

Docking point for subjective things is weird to me as well. "I wanted a minimap!"

[–] DulyNoted@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

This reviewer also went right into NG+ after finishing the main story. I guess play how you want, but that feels deeply wrong to me.

[–] DulyNoted@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

Ohhh, so that's why he was called Buzz Lightyear!

[–] DulyNoted@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

They also mention that the majority of homeless aren't that.

Yes, but the majority of visible homeless are.

[–] DulyNoted@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago

I mean it'd be as realistic as the rest of the AITA posts, I'm on board

[–] DulyNoted@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

I think the Russian conception of Nazi is literally someone who threatens Russia.

Yep. Just like the US definition of socialist/communist/terrorist

[–] DulyNoted@lemmy.world 19 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Unfortunate but this is the truth. Too many of us have been accustomed to small luxuries like "affording takeout", but we unfortunately have been priced out of being able to afford stuff like this.

It's a tough pill to swallow if you've been doing it your whole life and think that a functioning adult with a full-time job should be able to afford some takeout every now and again. We are not the generation that gets to enjoy that privilege, it seems.

[–] DulyNoted@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Centrism being villified in America is really weird, as that is explicitly championing extremism over moderation.

Leaping so hard onto one side that you cannot tolerate anyone's toe out of line, the party line must be upheld at all costs, is exactly the same kind of extremist shit we go after the right for. Just be better. It's easy to get caught up into the "us vs them", "black vs white", "red vs blue" thing, but it's really not that simple.

The example above is a strawman. I can do it too. One side says "kill all minorities", and the other side says "all minorities should become the new upper class of society." Neither side is actually pushing for either of those things, and we've turned real issues into disconnected make believe.

You're simplifying the problem to the point where you don't even have to think about it or consider a single argument. It's much easier if you make up some extremist shit and then say anything and everything is justified in opposition of that extreme.

view more: next ›