1

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/19953911

Guests:

  • Bastien Cruette, Systems Designer II
  • Thorsten Leimann, Lead Systems Designer
  • Guilleremo Bilbao, Gameplay Programmer III

TL;DW:

  • Resource Network will be used everywhere its possible (ships, land vehicles, outposts and space stations).
  • Resource Network is a replacement for the old Pipe System.
  • New system will allow for things like new types of Hydrogen fuel which affect thrusters in different ways.
  • New components coming with engineering:
    • Fuses
    • Life Support Generator
  • Engineering will be a start of moving away from ship HP pool and towards physicalized component HP.
  • Life Support system consists of:
    • Temperature
    • Atmosphere composition
    • Pressure inside a room
  • Components misfires might cause additional damage, make them stop working (temporarily of permanently), starting a fire or blowing up the whole ship (generators).
  • Initial release will have a limited number of misfires.
  • Damage penetration will be a temporary, simplified version of what will come with the physicalized damage. Certain types of weapons will penetrate the hull of a ship and damage components inside.
  • Damage penetration depends on weapon and ship armor.
  • We'll be able to repair fully destroyed components but not to 100% HP - that will require repairing the ship at LZ.
  • Only size 1-2 components can be replaced with a tractor beam.
  • Engineering screen shows:
    • Location of each component.
    • Connection between them.
    • Component status (HP).
    • Life support and Cooling status.
    • Component temperature.
    • Notifications about issues.
  • Fuel displayed on the engineering screen "will be relevant in the future".
  • You can lock the engineering UI to prevent changes from any other MFDs besides the engineering station.
  • Power Management presets will be a thing. They are locally stored and can be loaded on someone else's ship (the same type).
  • Doctor Benny (TARDIS) montage at the end.

This is the last ISC until Citizen Con.

1
Roadmap Roundup - September 18, 2024 (robertsspaceindustries.com)

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/19923948

Moved into the Alpha 3.24 column, targeting a 3.24.X release:

  • Acidic Caves
  • Rock Caves
  • MFD Rework and New Displays

Added to Release View:

  • Argo ATLS
25
3

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/19740016

Guest:

  • Chad McKinney, Senior Lead Gameplay Engineer

TL;DW:

  • Jared's head will be scanned for one of the games.
  • "When I said that (we're really close to releasing personal hangars) that doesn't mean we were close to going live."
  • ATC and transit were the most problematic parts to implementing the new hangar loop due to their age.
  • Transit is already in the process of rewriting, ATC will follow in the future.
  • Hooking personal hangars/cargo to the new mission system also shed light on some previously unknown problems with its implementation.
  • Since the 3.23.1 (later 3.24) patch was already late, they decided to spend more time on it to polish things and include some of the player feedback. They couldn't do more as they didn't want to cause a general delay for the rest of the company.
  • Chad wishes he'd split the functionalities more so they could deliver them faster and in a better state.
  • "In the original proposal of the item bank it works as it does now actually." (no drawer, just opens the old inventory UI)
  • Item kiosk UI will most likely stay as is (no drawer), just with all the improvements from the freight elevator kiosks (search and all the other stuff).
  • Answers from Rick Porter & Ian:
    • "We plan to add 'garage modules' so we don't intend to expand the pavement (of the personal hangars) but there should be more room for vehicles where you can basically add on modules and expand the hangars (...)"
    • "The plan is for personal hangars to be able to be customized and expanded in the future with addition of these modules (there's no finalized list of possible modules yet)."
    • They're planning to split the public and personal hangar decorations (cables and all the other garbage) to allow players to fully make the latter their own while keeping the public ones feel lived in/used.
    • We'll be able to move the freight elevator in our personal hangar when hangar customization modules are released.
    • Cargo decks need a significant rework as cargo gameplay approach has significantly changed since their implementation. They will be used in some way eventually.
  • ATLS tractor beam functionality will be an exclusive feature for now, there's ongoing discussion whether to copy it to other vehicles and handheld devices.
  • No bed logging from beds included in this year's Citizen Con goodie pack for now, overall work on bed logging and logging from hangars will happen in the future.
  • Hangar decorations being unruly is a problem with physics, more info in the last week's chat with Benoit. Will improve as server performance increases.
  • Option to put 1 SCU boxes into 8 SCU ones was removed due to issues on the delivery logic side (problems with delivery of nested objects). Will probably return in the future.
  • We'll be able to call our ships into other people's hangars eventually. There are still some technical and design problems to figure out before that happens.
  • ATC is probably the oldest system in the game.
  • Spawning vehicles from freight elevator is still planned.
  • They're looking into making the process of calling up your ship faster.
  • Chad haven't heard about hangar alarm (the one happening when spawning your ship) being a problem, there are no plans to adjust the volume or add an ability to turn it off at the moment.
  • They want to add support for manual loading for the Hull series and other ships that require docking. Improvements to automatic loading will come later.
  • Hover trolleys had some physics and game loop issues, they'll come back eventually.
  • Auto loading is planned to always be a thing but not for every object (not for mission cargo, some personal items).
  • Inventory search will include more item data/fields in the future.
  • Mining bags not working with freight elevators is a technical issue, they're aware of it.
  • There will be an option to spawn multiple ships at the same time in the future.
  • Option to name cargo boxes is still in design stage but it's planned.

No SCL next week, this one might be the last one until after Citizen Con.

4

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/19696130

Guests:

  • John Crewe, Vehicle Director
  • Ben Curtis, Vehicle Art Director
  • Nathan Lange, Senior Vehicle Artist
  • Falko Poiker, Vehicle Designer Principal
  • Kevin Turenne, Vehicle Artist Senior I
  • Alexander Palmer, UI UX Designer III
  • Gabriel Hector, Systems Designer III
  • Joe Dines, UI UX Designer II

TL;DW:

  • RSI Zeus MKII:
    • There's a front entrance (ladder).
    • "Zeus is an evolution on RSI style."
    • "It's a stepping stone ship."
    • ES (exploration) and CL (cargo) variants will release together.
    • It took a year to create.
  • MFDs:
    • Initial release of new ship MFDs will bring 5 styles (AEGIS, ANVIL, DRAKE, ARGO, generic).
    • Self status info will depend on active operator mode, there's a unique version for turrets.
    • Weapon status view is completely new.
    • Scanning and comms are moved to MFDs.
    • New diagnostics view with component health, errors and critical issues.
    • Bunch of settings will be adjustable from MFDs now (stuff like coupled mode toggle, g-safe, lag pips, casting to HUD etc).
    • Some visual changes to in-cockpit radars.

Lots of visuals so watch the episode for a full experience.

4
Upcoming Ship and Vehicle Loadout Changes (robertsspaceindustries.com)

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/19689109

Hi all,

As part of the ongoing development of vehicle systems, particularly with Resource Network and Engineering gameplay on the horizon, we've taken the opportunity to look across all our current vehicles ingame and revisit some of them in terms of both default item size and quantity.Reviewing both player feedback as well as analytics on usage and performance it was clear some ships/vehicles were underperforming and needed adjustment. Some vehicles were adjusted to bring them in line with others in their class to ensure competitiveness and some were adjusted because they simply had a abundance of power output that wasnt necessary anymore.

You may have noticed recent vehicle promotions and releases have strayed away from the typical max 1-2 Power Plants/Coolers/Shield Generators to higher numbers such as the Zeus and Retaliator having 4-6 Shield Generators for example and these updates will roll out similar changes across other ships and vehicles.

In addition to the changes below you can also expect handling & health changes to some vehicles to make sure they do not stray too far from their intended design behaviour, the Redeemer for example will get a buff in flight handling to compensate for the reduced shields and weaponry.

The following are the new default sizes/amounts for the specified item types per ship, e.g if something now says "1x S2 Powerplant" that means it now only has a single S2 Power Plant rather than gaining an additional S2 on top of its current Live loadout. Weapon changes are specifically listed for the relevant hardpoints.

AEGS Reclaimer

  • 1x S4 Cooler and 1x S4 Shield Generator

AEGS Redeemer

  • 6x S2 Shield Generators
  • Manned Turrets now 2x S4 Weapons

AEGS Vanguard

  • 1x Medium Power Plant (Sentinel has an additional Small Power Plant)

ANVL Carrack

  • 2x Large Power Plant

ANVL Gladiator

  • 1x S2 Power Plant, 1x S2 Shield Generator
  • Wing missile hardpoints now all S4
  • Wing weapon hardpoints now both S4

ANVL Hurricane

  • 2x S1 Power Plants

ANVL Valkyrie

  • 4x S2 Shield Generators
  • Remote Wing Turrets now 1x S4 Weapon

ARGO MPUV-1C & 1P 1x S0 Power Plant

ARGO Mole

  • 1x S3 Shield Generator

ARGO RAFT

  • 3x S2 Shield Generators

CNOU Mustang Gamma & Omega

  • 1x S1 Shield Generator

CRUS Starlifter C2 & M2

  • 2x S3 Power Plants

CRUS Starlifter A2

  • 3x S3 Shield Generators

CRUS Star Runner

  • 1x S3 Shield Generator

DRAK Caterpiller

  • 3x S3 Shield Generators

DRAK Buccaneer

  • 1x S1 Shield Generator

DRAK Vulture

  • 3x S1 Shields Generators

ESPR Prowler

  • 4x S2 Shields Generators

MISC Freelancer (All)

  • 2x S2 Power Plants, 3x S2 Shield Generators
  • Manned Turret weapons now 2x S3

MISC Hull A

  • 1x S2 Shield Generator

MISC Hull-C

  • 2x S3 Power Plants, 4x S3 Shield Generators

MISC Prospector

  • 3x S1 Shield Generators

MISC Starfarer (All)

  • 3x S3 Shield Generators

ORIG 350r

  • 1x S1 Power Plant

ORIG 400i

  • 1x S2 Power Plant, 1x S2 Cooler

ORIG 85X

  • Remote turret weapons now 2x S2

ORIG M50

  • 1x S1 Shield Generator

RSI Constellation (All)

  • Manned Turret weapons now 2x S3

Thanks for reading and remember, all stats are subject to change.

4
[-] Essence_of_Meh@lemmy.world 25 points 1 week ago

Katawa Shoujo is great!

I played it years ago and decided to replay it again a few months back. My initial playthrough was limited to Hanako's route (got a bad ending which I'm kind of baffled by after the replay) so this time I wanted to try out the other ones as well. Rin's story ended up being a surprise highlight of the whole process in a way I wasn't really prepared for (had some very familiar thoughts showing up there). Her whole story just clicked with me and wouldn't let go until some time after finishing it.

All the other routes were great as well (haven't touched Shizune/Misha one) and I'm glad I decided to give it another shot for an expanded experience. It was worth it and made me wish for more games with disabled protagonist/characters (without using it as their main characteristic obviously).

1
1
1
1
1
[-] Essence_of_Meh@lemmy.world 54 points 1 month ago

Sometimes I forget how unprofessional the game industry still is or how little respect people have for well being of others. I'd like to say I'm surprised but that would require having some expectations towards those companies.

I hope more VAs speak up about stuff like this so we can have some real changes.

[-] Essence_of_Meh@lemmy.world 28 points 1 month ago

Are you looking specifically for a community for communities? If not there's also Lemmy Explorer.

[-] Essence_of_Meh@lemmy.world 32 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Short version: it's a campaign to force publishers to provide some way to play online only games after they decide to shut down the servers. That or letting us know, by law, that games can be killed without repercussion. It's not about forcing publishers to keep the servers alive forever if that's what you're wondering.

Long version: check out the official website for the Stop Killing Games campaign. It has FAQ with all the important info.

[-] Essence_of_Meh@lemmy.world 53 points 3 months ago

TL;DW:

  • Patrick Breyer and Niklas Nienaß submitted questions to the European Commission on the topic of killing games (the latter in contact with Ross and two EU based lawyers).
  • EU won't commit to answering whether games are goods or services.
  • EULA are probably unfair due to imbalance of rights and obligations between the parties.
  • Such terminations should be analyzed on a case-by-case basis (preferably by countries rather than EU).
  • Existing laws don't seem to cover this issue.
  • Campaign in France seems to be gaining some traction. Case went to "the highest level where most commercial disputes submitted to DGCCRF never go".
  • UK petition was suppose to get a revised response after the initial one was found lacking. Due to upcoming elections all petitions were closed and it might have to be resubmitted.
  • Also in UK, there's a plan to report games killed in the last few years to the Competition and Markets Authority starting in August (CMA will get some additional power by then apparently).
  • No real news from Germany, Canada or Brazil.
  • Australian petition is over and waiting for a reply. Ross also hired a law firm to represent the issue.

This is a simplified version of simplified version, watch the video for more info.

[-] Essence_of_Meh@lemmy.world 85 points 3 months ago

While I can't provide you with a proper scientific answer I can offer a basic explanation - it's effort.

Browsing through the never ending amount of content online requires no effort but provides you with a dopamine rush as if you actually managed to accomplish or do something with your time. Other stuff, like watching movies, playing games, reading books, etc. requires attention and active participation, the payoff on the other hand is largely delayed (especially compared to the lazy option).

As for hacks... I don't know any. The only ways I know how to deal with it is limiting your time scrolling through this stuff and forcing yourself to do other things - it can be rough early on but you'll eventually get used to the "normal" way of functioning.

[-] Essence_of_Meh@lemmy.world 49 points 3 months ago

They're going to replace them with an AI powered tool, aren't they? If they're going to replace them at all that is.

[-] Essence_of_Meh@lemmy.world 44 points 4 months ago

That's positively surprising, I expected them to leave it at that until petition reaches the second milestone (if that even happens). Let's see if anything new comes out of this.

[-] Essence_of_Meh@lemmy.world 34 points 5 months ago

On the other hand they do have a history of protecting customers (weren't they the main reason behind Steams refund policy?) and that's what this is about.

[-] Essence_of_Meh@lemmy.world 32 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

I've got some points about this one.

  • they pitch a "deck that could actually play Fortnite" - game from a company who's CEO actively hates linux for whatever reason (maybe it kicked his dog, I dunno)
  • they talk how games bought on stores other than Steam will be "first-class citizens" which... you can already do on Steam Deck
  • they promote being free of hackers/cheaters because of immutable file system... something Steam Deck also has (though they do mention some additional digital signatures)
  • they want to be not only on handhelds but everywhere (laptops, tablets, phones, TV, cars...) - pretty ambitious for a company that didn't deliver anything yet
  • it'll be running on an ARM processor - we'll see how this works out (has anyone tried making a handheld like this?)
  • already mentioned no desktop mode - why is this mentioned as a positive exactly?
  • they want help from linux power users (feature requests, contribute code) but they don't know how open-source they want to be
  • they stole Witcher 3 video from some dude on YouTube

I'd like to think these are just screw ups/growing pains but nothing I've seen so far gives me any good vibes about it. We definitely need more choice and competition - this however does not look like an honest attempt at that. Let's hope I'm wrong.

Edit: Ah, how could I forget! Kirt McMaster, CEO of Playtron and the man responsible for killing CyanogenMod. Sounds great...

[-] Essence_of_Meh@lemmy.world 30 points 6 months ago

For those wondering about why such basic features are mentioned here it's because work on Squadron 42 (single player part of the project) moved to the polishing stage and everything created for it is being ported back to Star Citizen (multi player part).

Is it worth an article? It is if you're interested in the game, I guess?

Is SC a perfect project? Of course not, far from it. I do find it interesting however how... angry it makes people and how much they want it to fail. Yeah, I know $1000+ packages and so forth (not needed if you just want to play the game btw).

For those interested in actually checking for themselves whether it's a scam or not, there are free flight events multiple times a year - you get to see the current state of the game with everything good and bad it entails. Surprisingly enough, they tend to bring in more players every single time.

[-] Essence_of_Meh@lemmy.world 60 points 8 months ago

Is this suppose to be an article? Or is posting tweets linked on a website a new fad?

I know SC is a game many people like to dunk on (sometimes for completely right reasons) but let's not pretend like there's absolutely nothing there and CIG somehow scammed millions of players.

If anyone is actually interested in the game, I'd like to stress that you can buy the cheapest package and have access to everything using in-game money. There are also free flight events, available multiple times a year, so you can try the game out and decide for yourself if you like what's there. So far, despite horrible technical difficulties that often happen due to stress on the servers during those times the number of players keeps growing. Take that as you wish...

As for the package... Is it ridiculous? Yes, absolutely. It's 100% worth dunking on.

view more: next ›

Essence_of_Meh

joined 9 months ago