FelipeFelop

joined 2 years ago
[–] FelipeFelop@discuss.online 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

From a users point of view, I understand your concerns. When other clients are undergoing significant development. It’s a little disconcerting to see the pace of Liftoff development slow and bugs not getting fixed.

[–] FelipeFelop@discuss.online 1 points 2 years ago

Have you seen the discussion over on Matrix in Liftoff Development. From what I can tell, someone new has been doing things that hasn’t merged. Other than that not much has happened.

But really none of that matters because what matters to end users is seeing the bugs they encounter squashed and that’s not happening.

I’ve suggested before that this might be a funding issue and offered that users could donate.

[–] FelipeFelop@discuss.online 1 points 2 years ago

This seems to happen quite often. I don’t know if it’s a bug in Liftoff or the error message could be improved to better describe a problem with the instance.

[–] FelipeFelop@discuss.online 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

But you said from the top of the screen.

Which platform are you on and are you using the PWA or a native app?

[–] FelipeFelop@discuss.online 4 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Wouldn’t swiping from the top of the screen bring down the notification shade in Android or the Notification Centre/control centre in iOS?

[–] FelipeFelop@discuss.online 2 points 2 years ago

I don’t get the link. What have smart cars got to do with phone screens breaking. Surely the people who design smart cars will be different than the people who design phone screens ?

[–] FelipeFelop@discuss.online 3 points 2 years ago

There’s an awful lot crammed into the bottom left of a post. I would move the posters ‘name’ to the top and spread the bottom line out.

[–] FelipeFelop@discuss.online 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It literally says that it’s due to ageism!

[–] FelipeFelop@discuss.online 4 points 2 years ago

That was quick work, just updated. Thank you 😊

[–] FelipeFelop@discuss.online 1 points 2 years ago (3 children)

It was you that brought up using computers. You didn’t say anything about learning or progressing.

As for certain age, I think your answer actually supports my piint that it’s down to individual experience rather than age. Consider a manual worker who doesn’t trust technology and will only have a basic dumb phone. They are technology averse but might be in their 20s.

Computerisation of the workplace started in the 70s (I was there) and by the mid 80s was commonplace. Even shops were installing computerised systems then, even if it was a standalone register with a number of preset department numbers. A conservative estimate is that the majority of people working and living from 1990 onwards would have experience of computers whether at work, in shops, at the bank, in the car or public transport or at home. Let’s be generous and say they retired in 2000 at age 60 (will be higher in most countries) after ten years of familiarity then they’d be over 80 now.

And yet we have people much younger than that who are technology averse and unable or willing to learn. Why is that? Because age is not the deciding factor but people’s own lives experience.

Have a look at the UN Global Report on ageism and how it affects younger people as well as older people. The flip side of stereotyping older people is that you automatically stereotype younger people as being easily able to do the thing you think older people can’t do.

You’re right that the UN is not always consistent but note that the Secretary General is not talking exclusivity but that more support is needed and that they are referring to new technologies rather than email which has been around for over 50 years. I sent my first email in 1981 when addresses were resolved in the opposite way to nowadays.

[–] FelipeFelop@discuss.online 1 points 2 years ago

Excellent point

[–] FelipeFelop@discuss.online 2 points 2 years ago

Agreed, this is the most on topic post we’ve had for a while.

view more: ‹ prev next ›