[-] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 7 points 5 days ago

the universe is expanding at an increasing rate, we're just feeling the acceleration.

oh no maybe I shouldn't give them any ideas

[-] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 113 points 3 months ago

I think people misunderstand. I too would prefer privacy, but theres a big BUT.

Due to how the federation works, anyone who is tech savvy enough can already see votes. One way is to run an instance.

This change doesn't lower privacy, it aligns expectations with reality. A false sense of privacy, which people obviously show here in the comments, is way more dangerous.

[-] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 157 points 3 months ago

well, as long as the companies buying the ads think they work, we have an industry

[-] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 125 points 8 months ago

And everyone clapped

The CEO's name -- Albert Einstein.

[-] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 109 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

dogs ≤ 3
cats + dogs ≤ 4
others + cats + dogs ≤ 8
others ∈ Allowed Species

[-] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 289 points 8 months ago

11: It's the only browser on the market that is not either apple webkit or google chrome based. And it's in our best interest to keep said market healthy, with as many competing actors as possible.

[-] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 127 points 10 months ago

GPUs haven't been reasonably priced since the 1000 series.

And now there's no coin mining promising some money back.

[-] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 217 points 10 months ago

This is not a zero sum game. there's no competition. We can deal with both problems, we don't have to pick a side.

[-] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 127 points 1 year ago

I got a milkshake a while back, in a plastic container, with a plastic lid, for some reason it also came with a plastic spoon, and a paper straw, since they are cutting down on plastics...

[-] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 105 points 1 year ago

That's ridiculous, but I think the title makes it sound a lot more ridiculous than it actually is.

[the lawsuit] also named several private property management companies allegedly responsible for the bridge and adjoining land.

If he could just drive off a collapsed bridge without any warnings someone has clearly not taken their responsibility.

If there's a lack of signage and road blocks, and the map says the road is fine, I can see how one would make such an error.

I don't agree google maps should be held accountable here, but if this bridge has been collapsed for a decade, I can see why someone would want to at least pose the question.

view more: ‹ prev next ›

FiskFisk33

joined 1 year ago