-5
submitted 11 months ago by Frato@lemmy.ml to c/opensource@lemmy.ml
[-] Frato@lemmy.ml 2 points 11 months ago

i think the question is valid: it seems strange first, but the cli-env. is so MUCH MORE POWERFUL.

[-] Frato@lemmy.ml 4 points 11 months ago

classy ๐Ÿ™‚

[-] Frato@lemmy.ml 4 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

lynx (when possible), fff, cmus, mutt, latex, core-utils, mupdf (vi like keybindings), sxiv, mpv (no-gui)

i only use gui programs if no cli option exists: js-browser, gimp

[-] Frato@lemmy.ml 3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

... and that is why the average user stays an average user.

[-] Frato@lemmy.ml 3 points 11 months ago

Hey, i wanted to ask that!

[-] Frato@lemmy.ml 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

The more you learn about the original vision,. .. it is kind of terrifingly brilliant and powerful. The architects knew exactly what they were doing. That's why in the late 70's they tried the keep it from the public! (you can send thx to rms - he opened it up for us)

[-] Frato@lemmy.ml 6 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Sure, systemd does what it is supposed to do. It is NOT bad design from the admins perspective, but from a os-architecture perspective. It is a huge single binary with a huge number of 0-day exploits (you can check those). The scale of the projects causes many possible exploits. A set of small programs, which do only one thing, is easier to maintain (^= decentralization of os-design)

[-] Frato@lemmy.ml 3 points 11 months ago
  1. There is not a scientific proof YET, but i think it can be done: for that we would need to program the "corner-stone", which would be the *nix-program #1 - something that could show practically what the pioneers of the *nix system envisioned. This practical proof is possible, if we deep dive into the POSIX definition to analyze for what it was made.

  2. unix is a trademark, but what counts is the architectural vision behind it (D. Richie&co.) I think it would be better to avoid the tradmarked word (sry for using it) - *nix may be a proper word (although it implies that it is a whole group)

[-] Frato@lemmy.ml 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Hyperbola has the best vision for a clean and libre general-OS.

Yes, they very strict about the interpretation of "libre", but that makes the vision pure and crystal clear.

[-] Frato@lemmy.ml 2 points 11 months ago

made me smile, have an upvote ๐Ÿ˜‰

[-] Frato@lemmy.ml 3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

I think it is a very good thing to have TWO options when choosing a FSF conform distro. Yes, for a laptop linux may be the more versatile option (for now...) but on a server a BSD-distro will be pure gold.

p.s. i have no problems using bsd on a laptop right now - it's a very clean and well made system and the hardware support is sufficient.

20
HyperbolaBSD (lemmy.ml)
submitted 11 months ago by Frato@lemmy.ml to c/linux@lemmy.ml
[-] Frato@lemmy.ml 2 points 11 months ago

The community-manager (forum: throgh) is very competent, just register in the forums and post smt.

32
HyperbolaBSD (hyperbola.info)
submitted 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) by Frato@lemmy.ml to c/opensource@lemmy.ml

FSF approved distro (now Linux based soon with own FLOSS-BSD-kernel)

Do you want to participate? (esp. BSD-kernel-dev would be very welcome ๐Ÿ˜)

view more: next โ€บ

Frato

joined 11 months ago