It's not about actual safety, but perceived safety. If the design directly prevents you from feeling like you can go fast, you don't do it.
GissaMittJobb
Mass go brrrr
Residential wind for electricity generation is not really recommendable afaik, but it could be viable for some amount of heat generation, potentially: https://solar.lowtechmagazine.com/2019/02/heat-your-house-with-a-mechanical-windmill/
You can't opt out of government-provided health insurance. It's not even really referred to as health insurance, it's really just referred to as health care.
I get my additional private health insurance paid for by my employer, so I never actually pay myself, but the same one seems to be going for about €110 a month.
I don't know that I would buy it if I had to pay myself, but I'm quite happy to get it for the small amount of additional taxes I have to pay on the benefit from the employer.
For me, it's not music. Not mentally stimulating enough, it just makes me irritated. It has to be podcasts for me.
Music works when I'm doing tasks that are already mentally stimulating.
They are unironically attempting to murder us with cringe
Fler tåg, nu och för all tid.
300 km/h snitt hela vägen ner till södra Spanien, allt annat är otänkbart
Glöm inte att tydligt kommunicera sarkasm, annars får du smaka på alla foamers outgrundliga vrede.
They look quite sturdy too.
While not ideal, this can still be useful. In Sweden, we employ speed cameras strategically around areas of higher risk, such as intersections with cars coming onto a larger road with an obscured view. Reducing the speed in that particular spot does probably save lives.
Still, adjusting the design speed is the preferable alternative, but that does not make speed cameras completely ineffective.