GrammarPolice

joined 1 year ago
[–] GrammarPolice@lemmy.world 2 points 9 hours ago

It's not a policy failure; it's a feature of the system. We need a different system that doesn't allow the existence of billionaires to begin with

[–] GrammarPolice@lemmy.world 4 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

sybau lil bro🙏🥀

[–] GrammarPolice@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

Noooo my pretty! 😢

 
[–] GrammarPolice@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

No worries friend👍

[–] GrammarPolice@lemmy.world 11 points 2 days ago (2 children)

To be fair to me, I haven't seen any other posts on this on the fediverse.

[–] GrammarPolice@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago

I don't know the exact papers OOP cited, but here's one that is strongly supported.

Essentially, the researcher proposes that motivation influences reasoning not just by adding bias, but by affecting which cognitive strategies (beliefs, rules, memories) people use. Motivated reasoning is constrained; people are better able to reach their desired conclusion when they can construct plausible justifications for it. They are not completely free to conclude anything they like. So even when motivated to be accurate, bias may persist if individuals don’t have or don’t use more appropriate reasoning strategies.

[–] GrammarPolice@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Assuming the papers actually dispute the original claim, you'd expect the person to whom OP's referring to not require that approach but accept the facts and admit their wrongness upon viewing the data. The situation just ends up being ironic otherwise.

[–] GrammarPolice@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago

Your first mistake was trying to convince someone on Facebook of something at all

[–] GrammarPolice@lemmy.world 13 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Welcome to the fold comrade🤝. Currently in the process of trying to deradicalize my family from the right as well

 
[–] GrammarPolice@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago (2 children)

VOTERS ARE ALREADY AWARE THE PARTY IS PROBLEMATIC.

They don't need it repeated for the umpteenth time. She needs to start making more cutthroat statements and quit tap dancing around the conversation.

[–] GrammarPolice@lemmy.world -4 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

It's all about framing. She could've and should've been more assertive about it. While it's okay to point out the problem is bigger than the senate minority leader, she nevertheless should be about the matter. Millions of Americans will not be able to afford health insurance anymore. This isn't the time for pragmatism; everyone is angry, and her words should echo that anger. People want action and assertive language is as close to action other than action itself.

It's not even like it's scapegoating, Schumer has been incompetent for a while now, and this should be the final straw that breaks the camel's back.

[–] GrammarPolice@lemmy.world 9 points 3 days ago

UK - School

US - Gun range

 

I know she did an ad about jeans and it got a bit of outrage, but why are Trump and Republicans getting involved?

 

...if all labour were to be replaced by autonomous robots. Prices would drop to zero since companies aren't making or losing money anymore, and money would become worthless.

 
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/36752354

Got a 7 day ban on !memes@lemmy.ml after responding to this very abusive commenter with this image:

I reported their abusive comments somewhat expecting to get banned as well. It came as a shock to me when i saw my ban but this commenter got off scot-free. They didn't even so much as get a single abusive comment removed.

This is the most blatant double standard I've encountered on that instance.

Link to the thread: https://lemmy.world/comment/19699062

 

Got a 7 day ban on !memes@lemmy.ml after responding to this very abusive commenter with this image:

I reported their abusive comments somewhat expecting to get banned as well. It came as a shock to me when i saw my ban but this commenter got off scot-free. They didn't even so much as get a single abusive comment removed.

This is the most blatant instance of a double standard I've encountered on that instance.

Link to the thread: https://lemmy.world/comment/19699062

 
 
 
 
18
submitted 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) by GrammarPolice@lemmy.world to c/Football@lemm.ee
view more: next ›