i think one small addition
- decrease influence of ~~bribing~~ lobbying
i think one small addition
Ah ty, I'm learning spanish, is it supposed to be like the word "estadonidense"? i'm learning spanish from south america if that means anything in like word usage
That's fair. Don't you think the main point still stands? The US is abysmal for healthcare and is comparable to a much poorer nation which it embargoes?
Hey what is EEUU? I'm getting blanks on my search.
EDIT: It means amerika
cishet and still giving you critical support in your struggles against rigid gender role binarism 🫡
contemporary feminism (and the wave immediately before) have done a lot more for me than how men have told me I 'ought' to act. fine, I'm not as manly or a man as far as some are concerned. what is really annoying is the apathy and close-mindedness of most of these men who interacted with me negatively.
asking a few questions is enough to make them emotional (which is fine when they do it and not ok when others do it in a way unlike their own) and more intensely emotional than nearly all women i've interacted with. that too is fine, it becomes a pain when i'm taken to be some kind of enemy or other by standards it seems like they cannot apply to themselves.
i want to say they are gaslighting, only, i really don't think it's intentional. there's a genuine misunderstanding and that's annoying as heck.
Hm I don't understand, could you explain? I had a different experience so it's a bit difficult for me to get. My dad wasn't around until a bit later and by then I didn't respect him all that much. My mom raised me and told me to be nice with my dad and show him affection, otherwise I wouldn't have interacted with him as much. I think I've taken on characteristics from my mom as a result. What does it look like for someone to have a man or masculine kind of person around?
The rule of law in a specific geographic area in a specific period of time isn't nearly as important as the meaning conveyed which is misleading.
Rather than missing the forest for the trees, why might he push for the title of founder? Why might some discredit his efforts and tactics in assuming the founder of title in specific contexts?
He did not play a meaningful role in the beginning of the company and is not responsible for its success. Money was responsible, the two founders' expertise was responsible, that specific person is not special enough for their contribution to matter much. Anyone can supply capital especially during the inflated economic conditions (of which we are suffering the consequences of now) and during the time where EV and technology at large was developed enough to allow such developments to take place.
Wait, I'm even more confused. Are you saying the OP who posted is creating the demarcations for groups?
It's the right kind of doctor, it checks out!
It's unfortunate that the solution is as simple as it is and it's not being implemented.