[-] Jummit@lemmy.one 16 points 1 year ago

Actually one of the few languages you can learn in its completeness in less than a day, so I wouldn't really say it's "hard to understand". More like hard to read and understands programs written in it.

[-] Jummit@lemmy.one 16 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yes. The "tragedy of the commons" is a myth.

Without any limits, individual cattle owners have an incentive to overgraze the land, destroying its value to everybody.

This is factually false, because the land will be destroyed and individuals don't benefit, not even in the short term. Commons work great (see open source software), but capitalism and power structures abuse and destroy them for short-term profit.

[-] Jummit@lemmy.one 20 points 1 year ago

What do you think the authors of the video don't understand? You must have some insights if you say you understand AI better then everyone criticizing it.

[-] Jummit@lemmy.one 20 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

osu! is an amazing rhythm game. Try osu!lazer, it's the new client: https://osu.ppy.sh/home/download

I also like Pioneers and Endless Sky, both space sims.

This might not count, but both Lichess, a chess website, and OGS, a Go website are open source.

There is also Mindustry, but I haven't played it.

[-] Jummit@lemmy.one 52 points 1 year ago

Das hat er davon sich dafür einzusetzen die Erde zu retten.

Aber: In meinen Augen zeigt das, dass die Proteste Menschen erreichen. Leider kommen die meisten Menschen nicht über "Phase Eins: Verleugnung" und "Phase Zwei: Zorn" hinweg.

[-] Jummit@lemmy.one 19 points 1 year ago

I can recommend Sourcehut, it's still free right now: sourcehut.org You will need to learn how to use Git with email, but that isn't a bad skill to have anyway, so why not.

[-] Jummit@lemmy.one 22 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I don't see how rejecting 18th century-style factories or exploitative neural networks is a bad thing. We should have the option of saying "no" to the ideas of capitalists looking for a quick buck. There was an insightful blog post that I can't find right now...

[-] Jummit@lemmy.one 43 points 1 year ago

I find this question a little weird, because open source software (which includes the Fediverse) was already a very political movement from the beginning.

As for organizing, since there is no main authority or philosophy beyond make software open, it's up to you and like-minded individuals to use the space as you seem fit.

[-] Jummit@lemmy.one 29 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

That said, it is completely understandable that some users may feel uncomfortable using an account to access the service. For such cases we strongly recommend hosting your own deployment of Jitsi Meet. We spend a lot of effort to keep that a very simple process and this has always been the mode of use that gives people the highest degree of privacy.

Seems like you can avoid it by self-hosting. Still a very suspicious move, kinda defeats the whole point of an alternative to big tech conference services.

Google, GitHub and Facebook for starters but may modify the list later on

Maybe they could support some auth provider from some fediverse app? That would be kinda neat.

5
submitted 1 year ago by Jummit@lemmy.one to c/programming@lemmy.ml

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.one/post/2707178

An interesting blog post that reflects some ideas I've been thinking about lately.

Since nothing close to the environment described in the article has entered the mainstream since ten years, it's safe to say that it's probably too hard or maybe too inconvenient.

I'd still like programming to go into this general direction, our tooling is really limited in comparison with how complex software has become.

10
submitted 1 year ago by Jummit@lemmy.one to c/programming@beehaw.org

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.one/post/2707178

An interesting blog post that reflects some ideas I've been thinking about lately.

Since nothing close to the environment described in the article has entered the mainstream since ten years, it's safe to say that it's probably too hard or maybe too inconvenient.

I'd still like programming to go into this general direction, our tooling is really limited in comparison with how complex software has become.

11

An interesting blog post that reflects some ideas I've been thinking about lately.

Since nothing close to the environment described in the article has entered the mainstream since ten years, it's safe to say that it's probably too hard or maybe too inconvenient.

I'd still like programming to go into this general direction, our tooling is really limited in comparison with how complex software has become.

[-] Jummit@lemmy.one 16 points 1 year ago

violations could bring fines worth up to 6 percent of their global revenue – which could amount to billions – or even a ban from the EU.

Not too shabby! Seems like the laws at least have some teeth.

[-] Jummit@lemmy.one 15 points 1 year ago

Probably because it ignores issues that are relevant right now in favor of some theoretical distant future which will probably never pan out.

1
submitted 1 year ago by Jummit@lemmy.one to c/artshare@lemmy.world

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.one/post/1289556

I recently finished the series, this is one of the scenes which I find most striking. I used pencil to sketch and fineliner and alcohol-based markers for the rest.

62
submitted 1 year ago by Jummit@lemmy.one to c/creative@beehaw.org

I recently finished the series, this is one of the scenes which I find most striking. I used pencil to sketch and fineliner and alcohol-based markers for the rest.

view more: next ›

Jummit

joined 1 year ago