71
65
52
submitted 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) by KarnaSubarna@lemmy.ml to c/privacy@lemmy.ml

A Real-Time Website Privacy Inspector

Who is peeking over your shoulder while you work, watch videos, learn, explore, and shop on the internet? Enter the address of any website, and Blacklight will scan it and reveal the specific user-tracking technologies on the site—and who’s getting your data. You may be surprised at what you learn.

[-] KarnaSubarna@lemmy.ml 3 points 6 days ago

What Firefox provides here:

A connector to LLM providers.
Accelerators (context menu options).

From a coding perspective, this should ideally be a very lightweight functionality.

This feature is very analogous to options to add a search engine, and also to provide accelerators via context menu.

While it can be done via third-party or Official Mozilla add-ons, but (to me) it still makes sense to have it part of the product.

[-] KarnaSubarna@lemmy.ml 1 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

If you're using a VPN at the OS or browser level, just like any other traffic, your query to the LLM service will be routed via the VPN. That VPN could be any VPN of your choice - Firefox VPN, Mullvad, or Proton etc.

The only problem is that most LLMs require a profile/login to work with. In such cases, using a VPN will be useless, as the LLM server will know who you are.

[-] KarnaSubarna@lemmy.ml 3 points 6 days ago

It's just a plain integration with 3rd-party or self-hosted LLM service.

I'm not sure if Mozilla will make money from this feature in any way.

Have you read anything about it anywhere?

[-] KarnaSubarna@lemmy.ml 5 points 6 days ago
[-] KarnaSubarna@lemmy.ml 12 points 6 days ago

It's just an integration with LLM services and not AI baked-in the browser code. You can even self-host any such service (Ollama) and integrate Firefox with it. That will make sure your query is not leaving your network.

242
259
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by KarnaSubarna@lemmy.ml to c/technology@lemmy.ml

A federal judge has ruled that Google has an illegal monopoly in the US. “The market reality is that Google is the only real choice” as the default search engine, Judge Amit Mehta said in his decision, and he determined it had gotten that way unfairly. It’s a ruling that could portend big changes for the company, but we yet don’t know how big, and we might not for years.

Mehta declared on Monday that Google was liable for violating antitrust laws, vindicating the Department of Justice and a coalition of states that sued the tech giant in 2020. The next step — deciding on remedies for its illegal conduct — begins next month. Both parties must submit a proposed schedule for remedy proceedings by September 4th and then appear at a status conference on September 6th.

[-] KarnaSubarna@lemmy.ml 45 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

In India, the share of Linux desktop became double just within one year (from 8% to 16%). I only hope this data is right.

https://gs.statcounter.com/os-market-share/desktop/india/#monthly-202301-202407

89
submitted 1 month ago by KarnaSubarna@lemmy.ml to c/linux@lemmy.ml
24
198
169
224
submitted 2 months ago by KarnaSubarna@lemmy.ml to c/linux@lemmy.ml

For those wanting to build a Wayland-only Linux desktop experience without carrying any aging X11 baggage, GNOME 47 will be able to optionally offer Wayland-only support without carrying X11/X.Org support. This Mutter merge request landed today that allows compiling Mutter with X11 support disabled. That landed today along with this GNOME Shell merge request for being able to disable X11 support too.

143
submitted 2 months ago by KarnaSubarna@lemmy.ml to c/linux@lemmy.ml
187
submitted 3 months ago by KarnaSubarna@lemmy.ml to c/technology@lemmy.ml
[-] KarnaSubarna@lemmy.ml 52 points 5 months ago

Bad news is that it is not clear at this point whether Mozilla is going to go forward with the implementation. A post on Reddit by one of the project members suggests that the build is a "rough proof-of-concept". Some features tested in the build "did not survive". It is unclear which did not, as they are not mentioned. Mozilla is, however, implementing those that survived the cut into Firefox. Again, the poster does not mention which those are. It is also not verified that the poster is actually a member of the project team, so take this with a grain of salt as well.

[-] KarnaSubarna@lemmy.ml 117 points 5 months ago
  • Careful choice of program to infect the whole Linux ecosystem
  • Time it took to gain trust
  • Level of sophistication in introducing backdoor in open source product

All of these are signs of persistent threat actors aka State sponsor hacker. Though the real motive we would never know as it's now a failed project.

[-] KarnaSubarna@lemmy.ml 48 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

There is a work-in-progress version of Firefox for iOS with Gecko engine.

But, there is also a challenge that Mozilla is facing as Apple is still trying to make life of developers of other browsers as difficult as possible.

So, not sure how the whole thing will turn out.

view more: next ›

KarnaSubarna

joined 11 months ago