22
submitted 1 year ago by Kempeth@feddit.de to c/boardgames@feddit.de

How was it? What can you recommend? Or not?

[-] Kempeth@feddit.de 23 points 1 year ago

Republicans are probably fully on board with these new charges. I hear they have quite the obsession with former white house residents deleting stuff that pertains to the government from private systems...

[-] Kempeth@feddit.de 17 points 1 year ago

Uhm. GoT isn't exactly the first to use this expression...

[-] Kempeth@feddit.de 29 points 1 year ago

Good time to plug Dara O'Brian: don't do that. One day you're gonna have kids and need these words in their normal context. Your kid is gonna come in with muddy shoes and you're all "oh my. You're a dirty girl." and then you'll ask yourself wtf you just said to your own kid.

Some words and expressions need to stay with their original meaning! These include:

  • dirty,
  • naughty and *tone of voice breaks*
  • do what daddy tells you!
[-] Kempeth@feddit.de 17 points 1 year ago

Tonight it's just you, me, a bottle of olive oil and a "seven step program".

47
submitted 1 year ago by Kempeth@feddit.de to c/food@beehaw.org

After picking up the recipe on the site that shall not be named we finally got around to making it and absolutely love it!

Credit goes to ameliaisnotachef for the recipe:
Garlic Confit

  • 1.5 heads of garlic
  • 1 cup or so of olive oil- enough to cover the garlic cloves

Add olive oil to small sauce pan and heat on medium. Once oil is hot, add garlic cloves and reduce to low and cook for about an hour. Set aside

Harissa Chicken

  • 3.5 oz harissa paste
  • 1 tablespoon gently crushed coriander seeds
  • 3 large cloves garlic, grated
  • 1 tablespoon ginger, grated
  • 1.5 tablespoons fresh lemon juice
  • 0.25 cup olive oil
  • 3 tablespoons honey
  • 1 teaspoon crushed red pepper flakes
  • 0.5 teaspoon cumin
  • 3.5 lbs boneless skinless chicken thighs, trimmed and cut into 1 inch pieces

Step 1
Add all ingredients except for chicken in a medium bowl and mix

Step 2
In a large bowl, add chicken and marinade and toss thoroughly. Chill for 2 hours or longer - overnight is ideal.

Cucumber Salad

  • 6 Persian cucumbers, halved and sliced
  • 0.5 cup diced red onion
  • 0.5 cup apple cider vinegar
  • 0.25 cup water
  • 0.5 cup sugar

Step 1
Add apple cider vinegar, water, and sugar to a medium bowl and mix to combine until sugar is dissolved.

Step 2
Add cucumbers and red onion to bowl and toss. Refrigerate for 30 minutes and then drain- serve immediately! (Meh, it was entirely fine sitting like this in the fridge for a day)

Garlic Herbed Yogurt

  • 1.5 cups plain greek yogurt
  • 3 tablespoons chopped dill
  • 1 teaspoon salt
  • 1.5 tablespoons lemon juice
  • as many garlic confit cloves as you’d like (since they are cooked, they are milder)

Add all ingredients to a bowl and mix. Set aside

Final Assembly
When chicken is ready to be grilled, skewer all pieces of chicken and grill on medium high for about 6 minutes, flip and another 6 minutes. Cook until internal temperature reaches 170°F

Warm a piece of naan- I like to dampen paper towels and wrap the naan and stick in the microwave for about 30 seconds.

Spread a decent amount of garlic yogurt on naan, add a chicken skewer, and then top with cucumber salad.

Personal Notes
Yoghurt was too salty for my taste and the meat not salty enough. Overall the amount was good but I would probably move about half the salt from the Yoghurt to the meat.

Also this is a huge batch! Probably something like 6-8 portions depending on how much of an eater you are. The naans also add quite a bit of bulk.

[-] Kempeth@feddit.de 25 points 1 year ago

Your description sounds so nice and fair - allowing everyone to take full control of their wealth.

So let me ask you: when was the last time you successfully negotiated the price of your groceries or utilities?

You don't. Because that "fairness" only exists between entities of equal power.

[-] Kempeth@feddit.de 42 points 1 year ago

Capitalism is an amazing engine to produce wealth. But it's also extremely opposed to the idea of distributing it.

14
submitted 1 year ago by Kempeth@feddit.de to c/boardgames@feddit.de

I'm tinkering with a framework to implement board games in c# (similar to boardgame.io in JS) part of that is getting a handle on turn structures. (What is a round? what is a turn? who gets to go when? etc)

So I've gone through all my games and looked for recurring patterns and exceptions to them and here's what I've collected so far:

  • There's always at least one structure that handles how player act or "take turns"
    • the vast majority of games do traditional turns - one player does things, then then another,
      • usually in a fixed order maybe going forward some times and backward other times.
      • sometimes the order can change
      • also possible are:
        • turn order decks (you don't know who goes next but know that everyone gets a turn)
        • action tracks (where whoever is furthest back gets to go next, possibly resulting in an uneven number of turns)
        • the next player is dependent on an action of the previous player
    • it's also possible that players can play simultaneously
      • a complete free for all is pretty common
      • it's also possible that players can act freely to some point, then have to wait for everyone else to catch up
    • another consideration, both for concurrent and sequential play is that sometimes some players are excluded (Codenames for example lets all guessers on a given team act concurrently but not the leaders or the other team)
    • there can be different rules at different times (like first picking a tile in sequence then everyone can place it simultaneously)
    • and there can be nested rules (like every player gets to run an auction but in every auction each player get's to bid as well)
    • one relatively common special case is where certain actions on a player's turn result in decisions being needed from other players (trades, attacks, "each player ..." effects)
  • there are often structures that simply subdivide another structure
    • they can occur at any level. A game may be divided into "setup" and "play", a round could be divided into different phases but a single player's turn might also be divided into smaller steps.
    • these subdivision usually restrict / specify which actions are allowed in them
    • these subdivision often come with limits like: you can only do N actions
    • sometimes a player can "pass" sometimes they cannot

I'm wondering if anyone can think of an instance that is not covered by these "rules".

12
submitted 1 year ago by Kempeth@feddit.de to c/boardgames@feddit.de

dpunked seems to be sleeping in... So, what did you folks play last week?

[-] Kempeth@feddit.de 35 points 1 year ago

Which makes the integral sign ∫ a non-discrete for-loop

[-] Kempeth@feddit.de 24 points 1 year ago

Off course, fellow human!

[-] Kempeth@feddit.de 50 points 1 year ago

I like to explain this phenomenon as the free cake effect.

Say you set up a food stand with a sign "free cake". It doesn’t matter how many cakes you baked, people will keep showing up until all the cake is gone.

[-] Kempeth@feddit.de 20 points 1 year ago

For the people who don't want to squint at a weird format image:

  • Communism: You have two cows. The state takes both and gives you some milk
  • Fascism: You have two cows. The state takes both and sells you some milk (someone here has a very benign definition of fascism)
  • Socialism: You have two cows. You give one to your neighbor who had none.
  • Bureaucratism: You have two cows. The state takes both, kills one, milks the other and then throws the milk away.
  • Tradition Capitalism: You have two cows. You sell one to buy a bull. Your herd multiplies and the economy grows. You sell them and retire on the profit.
  • Venture Capitalism: You have two cows. You sell three of them to your publicly listed company, using letters of credit opened by your brother in law at the bank, then execute a debt/equity swap with an associated general offer so that you get all four cows back, with a tax exemption for five cows. The milk rights of the six cows are transferred via an intermediary to a Cayman Island Company secretly owned by the majority shareholder who sells the rights to all seven cows back to your listed company. The annual report says the company owns eight cows, with an option to buy one more.
  • French Corporation: You have two cows. You go on strike because you want two.
  • Italian Corporation: You have two cows. You don't know where they are. You decide to have lunch
  • Swiss Corporation: You have 500 cows. None of them belong to you. You just charge for storing them.
  • American Corporation: You have 2 cows. You sell one and force the other to produce milk like 4 cows. You hire an independent consultant to determine why the cow died.
  • Indian Company: You have 2 cows. You worship them.
  • Irish Company: You have 2 cows. One of them is a horse.
  • Australian Company: You have 2 cows. Business seems pretty good. You close the office and go for a few beers to celebrate.
  • Iraqi Company. You have no cows. Noone believes you. The US bombs the crap out of you and invades your country. You still have no cows but at least you have a democracy now.
  • British Company: You have 2 cows. Both are mad.
  • Greek Company: You have 2 cows borrowed from French and German banks. You eath both. The banks call to collect their milk but you cannot deliver. The IMF loans you 2 cows. You eat both. The banks and the IMF call to collect their milk. You're out getting a haircut.
  • Chinese Company: You have 2 cows. You have 300 people milking them. You claim full employment and max bovine productivity. You arrest the journalist who reported the real situation.
[-] Kempeth@feddit.de 18 points 1 year ago

Russian copium brigade out for a special typing operation

[-] Kempeth@feddit.de 22 points 1 year ago

Oh boy. My current employer had an app built inhouse over 18 months I think. Nobody cared to be involved in the reviews providing nothing more than "good good" until the thing was done. Then suddenly everything was "ugly and not what they wanted". An external company was hired who promised to rebuild it from scratch in 3 months. The internal devs were shuffled around, many quit. 2 years later the external company finally releases version 1 and celebrates themselves as absolute heroes. The were then set to work on taking over the current project the internal team had been working on... They again changed everything and made pretty much everyone on the team leave. That was another 2 years ago and they are getting close to release which no doubt will be celebrated again.

Luckily my work is a whole lot more specialized and the consultants we work with are actually competent and not greedy.

0
submitted 1 year ago by Kempeth@feddit.de to c/boardgames@feddit.de

While I like the concept of the game, I find the amount of key words and rules to juggle cumbersome and my GF was unable to get a handle on what to do.

What's your experience with sticking with the game? Any tipps that helped you internalize the gameplay?

PS I've already tried in solo but it's even more fiddly that way.

1
submitted 1 year ago by Kempeth@feddit.de to c/rpg@lemmy.ml

your healing spells are more effective. Whenever you use a spell of 1st level or higher to restore hit points to a creature, the creature regains additional hit points equal to 2 + the spell's level.

What happens when I cast a level 1 spell using a level 2 spell slot?

Literal reading would suggest that the spell slot is irrelevant only the inherent level of the spell but I have seen statements to the contrary.

It's not a huge difference. But I'd still like to know.

2
submitted 1 year ago by Kempeth@feddit.de to c/aww@lemmy.ml
view more: next ›

Kempeth

joined 1 year ago