[-] Kept7963@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

Say you have your display, this is made up of millions of lights that on their own just light up in whatever single colour you want, but together they light up to create an image.

Your software takes care of breaking down that image of a cat you want to look at into its corresponding pixels - with a value for colour and brightness.

For example it'll say this area in the cat's eye is black, so it'll request the no light to come out of it. Another area might be a pale red so it'll request red with some middle level of brightness.

Now your firmware takes that requested black for a specific Pixel and it'll physically cut power to switch off all the lights in the required area. For the pale red it'll power that the red ligh ON with hald power, whilst green and blue are OFF.

(things get more complex once you consider back-lightning)

[-] Kept7963@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago

Because of course people are always reasonable and back people and policies that are in their interest.

It seems like by and large there's support in Russia for the invasion in Ukraine. They might not be willing to go to full mobilisation, but if they don't have to die themselves they're fine with the invasion.

Do you propose that the Ukrainians should stop fighting and plead with the Russian people to overthrow Putin?

[-] Kept7963@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

There's not that much choice there, it genuinely takes 2-3 years to implement hardware that is radically different from what you're currently doing.

Because they're making millions upon millions of phones, they need to really nail the design before they start mass production. And that's neither cheap nor fast.

The big manufacturers can probably afford to do this faster, but the smaller ones might struggle so you need to make it fair.

By 'those privacy laws' do you mean GDPR? Because that's caused Threads not to be released in the EU, and you'll notice that all your devices now have USB C. These regulations have had a pretty significant impact.

[-] Kept7963@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

The interesting part is that McLaren were fast in the corners, so that's a good sign for Hungary.

[-] Kept7963@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago

We went through this back in the day on r/Formula1, banning spoilers restricts the conversation.

I get that sometimes you're not able to watch live, restrict the Formula1 content you consume during that time.

You can't have the entire F1 community tiptoe around you because you've not watched the race.

Having said that, other race series should be spoiler-free in this community.

[-] Kept7963@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Aren't we infantilising F1 drivers then? "If we don't put something physically in their way they won't obey the rules".

Other series have figured it out - MotoGP paints off-limits areas green and they put sensors on the edge. You get too many infringements you get a long lap penalty which costs you a few seconds.

I think this race worked well and they need to do the same at future races, and build consistency. Then people will learn not to take liberties.

If the enforcement overhead is too big, add a fine to the penalty as well: you cross off the track, you get €500 fine as well. Then use that to pay for extra stewards (or set up an automated system).

[-] Kept7963@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

That's a non-starter if you want to host motorcycle racing at that track.

Personally I welcome the new track limits rules, you step out of line you pay for it.

These are the best drivers in the world, surely they have enough control to make sure they don't get a penalty.

Some of them managed, others not so much.

Kept7963

joined 1 year ago