[-] LizardKing@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 year ago

Cars are not living organisms, are not species, and they serve us in every way, not the other way around.

Braindead take.

[-] LizardKing@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 year ago

City folks don't know about crop rotation.

[-] LizardKing@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 year ago

I've worked retail, I've seen people buy nine 12-packs of soda every couple of days. I wouldn't be surprised.

[-] LizardKing@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

But more partners = more rules

Do you even believe the bullshit you're spewing?

[-] LizardKing@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Spoken like an inexperienced fool who's never been cheated on.

You can't love someone and cheat on them. Thats not love, that's one of the most egregious betrayals of trust a human can commit.

[-] LizardKing@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

100% agree. Whoever made this "guide" was attempting to portray monoamory as a bad thing, maybe even worse than cheating.

It reads as though the author is someone single, or someone in an unhappy polyamorous relationship with feelings of resentment towards those in monoamorous relationships.

[-] LizardKing@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 year ago

"Nothing saying cheating is good"

In the cheating section there are 3 smiling faces and 2 bright red hearts, one of which is wearing "cool" sunglasses.

The monoamory tile has a frowning face, a big red x, and a broken heart.

I'm sorry but the imagery is definitely there, despite your decision to disregard it.

[-] LizardKing@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Look at cheating, then look at monoamory, then try to tell me this "guide" doesn't have some fucked up bias.

Based on this post alone, would someone think cheating or monoamory is worse?

[-] LizardKing@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Passive aggressively dismissive of standard relationships while fantasizing about having multiple interested partners.

Very much seems like someone's "sour grapes" attempt at explaining why they're alone.

i.e. "I don't have a SO because my views on relationships are incompatible with most, totally not because of my personality, or lack thereof."

Every dynamic depicted here is shown with positive labels and imagery except the normal monoamorous relationship. Monoamory is depicted as neglectful and harmful, and labeled "idealized" as if the idea is absurd or unattainable.

Hell, CHEATING is depicted with less negative imagery than monoamory.

[-] LizardKing@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

This post reeks of incel fantasy.

[-] LizardKing@sh.itjust.works 21 points 1 year ago

Yeah it felt like it was for casual rpg player. It was fun, the writing and gameplay was great, but it certainly lacked depth in some areas.

[-] LizardKing@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago

Based on your username and post history it's pretty clear why you're against the democratic process.

This is not a safe space for people that believe the way you do. This will never be a haven for hateful ignorance like yours.

Try Parler, or or one of the other right wing echo chambers.

Stop trying to turn this website into your own personal hateful circlrjerk, it's not gonna happen.

This place is not for you.

1
foolproof (sh.itjust.works)

Cell walls

3
get played (sh.itjust.works)
1
drugs (sh.itjust.works)
1
druggo (sh.itjust.works)
9
boumce (sh.itjust.works)
12
bird brain (sh.itjust.works)
16
en garde (sh.itjust.works)
4
I love science (sh.itjust.works)
2
be prepared (sh.itjust.works)
1
how to get gril (sh.itjust.works)
1
history is cool (sh.itjust.works)
1
view more: next ›

LizardKing

joined 1 year ago