LookBehindYouNowAndThen

joined 1 year ago
[–] LookBehindYouNowAndThen@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Kaboom read a comment on the Internet.

He scoffed and shook his head in derision. "I can't possibly kiss my own ass. This guy doesn't even know how anatomy works!"

He taps out a blindingly stupid statement and smiles smugly to himself. "Another good day," he says, patting his own back.

[–] LookBehindYouNowAndThen@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Despite the sense of entitlement you feel, I'm not here to entertain you and your pea-brain understanding of what I said.

Get over it.

[–] LookBehindYouNowAndThen@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (5 children)

Nobody said anything about means but you.

Why do y'all always tell on yourselves?

[–] LookBehindYouNowAndThen@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (7 children)

Of course you don't think you're a fascist, a fish doesn't know it's wet. You've asked me for a definition before, and that's not what I gave you. Leave it to reactionaries to act like they know everything while only regurgitating the corporate propaganda that they've gorged themselves on like the good little shit-eaters they are.

So I don't feel like repeating myself to you, since you don't listen anyway.

Funny how you don't want a world without fascists though. That's very illuminating, thank you for sharing.

[–] LookBehindYouNowAndThen@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (9 children)

No, if I had my way there'd be no fascists on Lemmy or IRL.

But for now I'll settle for annoying you whenever I see you write something stupid.

[–] LookBehindYouNowAndThen@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago (11 children)

IDK, why do you give a shit about a Harry Potter com?

Projection, as always with conservatives. They're just not in touch with their emotions, I guess.

[–] LookBehindYouNowAndThen@lemmy.world 8 points 3 days ago (13 children)

Conservatives do love their safe spaces.

[–] LookBehindYouNowAndThen@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

It's probably more effective to yell at someone who is going to read it.

[–] LookBehindYouNowAndThen@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (6 children)

It seems you're having a separate conversation with yourself, so I'll just leave you to it.

Politician can endorse whoever they want. I'm not interested in whatever you think I'm saying.

[–] LookBehindYouNowAndThen@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (8 children)

My point is that I'll be shocked if the establishment Dems don't try and tank his campaign by endorsing Cuomo instead. I'll be pleasantly surprised if that doesn't happen.

Seems they'd rather lose to a Republican than win as progressives.

[–] LookBehindYouNowAndThen@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (10 children)

This isn't relevant at all to what I said.

I'm well aware that this is a primary. Did you even read the article? Liberal smugness is probably going to help in this situation, thanks for the contribution on a subject you clearly know all about.

 
 
 
 
 

Curious if anyone has the original Universal Monk comment handy.

 
 
 

)

 
 
 
 
view more: next ›