[-] Maiq@lemy.lol 4 points 2 weeks ago
[-] Maiq@lemy.lol 11 points 2 weeks ago

At a medium pace.

[-] Maiq@lemy.lol 3 points 4 weeks ago

My explanation above just gives the illusion of entire computer encryption.

Say you have a separate hd for each OS. Each with bootloaders on their drives. To bypass grub running luksopen you can boot directly into windows in the bios, in this instance the windows bootloader will be used to load windows. However if your bios is set to boot your Linux HD and grub has successfully found your windows drive and created a boot entry for it, it should be selectable after luks decryption. This can give the illusion that windows is encrypted while not really being so to an advanced user. There is nothing preventing you from mounting windows as its not really encrypted, just the way grub loads Luks before OS selecton. If I remember correctly systemd-boot loads OS selection before luksopen giving no appearance of encryption till after your OS selection, you should be able to boot windows without the false sense of drive decryption.

[-] Maiq@lemy.lol 3 points 1 month ago

Cursory internet search says your right. I sware I read it on one of Stephen's one liner dumps. Doesn't mean that I'm remembering correctly.

[-] Maiq@lemy.lol 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Di you have an Optimus computer with 2 GPUs? Is your computer using a nvidia card? If so you might look into prime -> arch wiki.

You may or may not have to start D-resolve in a terminal prime-run %command% to force prime render offload.

[-] Maiq@lemy.lol 4 points 2 months ago
[-] Maiq@lemy.lol 2 points 2 months ago

This is awesome! I can't wait to check it out.

Also congratulations on being approached by and joining KDE's ecosystem.

[-] Maiq@lemy.lol 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Does Dad know?

Does Dad know?

[-] Maiq@lemy.lol 4 points 6 months ago

Quick impression for ya; caw, caw, bang fuck I'm dead!

Dont feel bad, I spent most of my life thinking it was from The Crow as well.

[-] Maiq@lemy.lol 8 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Neoliberalism is a far right ideology brought to mainstream politics by Ronald Reagan and Margret Thatcher. Later embraced by the most right wing of the american pseudo left like Clinton who abandoned their traditional union and grassroot support for the big banks and extra large corporate funding. This led to the embracement of neo conservativism by Newt Gingrich and the right in general to differentiate themselves from the new political shift from the pseudo left wings encroachment on their bread basket, the corporations. Enter the US downward spiral to our current political landscape as the neolibral wing marches ever right and the conservative wing courts the endless bag of batshit crazy.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neoliberalism

Just because the word has the root liber in it does not make it left on a political spectrum.

view more: ‹ prev next ›

Maiq

joined 6 months ago