[-] MentalGymnastics@sh.itjust.works 0 points 3 months ago

I don't know what you're talking about. The dude said girls dont play dota 2 and claimed it's because they get trolled or harassed or whatever. I said no, they just don't like that game since there is not a single female esport player in that game. Val which you claim is so toxic has female esport players. You don't even address anything I say you just make unsubstantiated claims even contradicting claims. You say female gamers won't want to continue playing games if they encounter someone being mean to them but then you say it seems there are more girls than ever playing. So which one is it?

We already have ways to address someone being toxic to you. It's called the mute and report button. What more do you want? An ai listening to every word you say banning you for even the slightest banter? People will become afraid to even say anything for fear of accidently slighting one of you snowflakes.

[-] MentalGymnastics@sh.itjust.works 0 points 3 months ago

Your the one all worked up calling people corporate bootlickers. Pretend all you want that you don't live in a world where you don't support corporations to enjoy music. Pretend all you want that your not doing the same exact shit your complaining about. Your sucking off some rich dude just to for whatever reason avoid giving money to a corporation and instead give it straight to rich dudes pocket. Weirdo is acting like he doesn't listen to his shitty music on YouTube music or Apple or whatever corpo platform. Keep pretending you would even know half the artists you do without corporations allowing them to advertise it on an app you use on your cellphone.

[-] MentalGymnastics@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

The fact meta has received 2 billion dollars in taxpayer gov't money should entitle every single taxpayer to their 1st amendment.

[-] MentalGymnastics@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 months ago

Your open mic night hypothetical is not a shadow ban. That's just a normal ban. Which is I think what people are asking for. If these social media companies are going to censor us on the Internet we essentially built via govt subsidies hell we even essentially build these companies by giving straight to them gov't subsidies then fuck yea notify us that we are actively being censored.

[-] MentalGymnastics@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 months ago

That's cool. I've never had those problems at all other than 1 damaged order once which believe it or not you can purchase a damaged product at a store as well. Matter of fact just last week I bought what I thought to be something new inside a store and it was clearly used. I've never experienced that at Amazon but yea anyways sucks to suck doesn't it?

[-] MentalGymnastics@sh.itjust.works 0 points 4 months ago

Press x to doubt.

[-] MentalGymnastics@sh.itjust.works -1 points 4 months ago

They already told him just keep them. This same thing happened to me few months back. They literally don't have a way to accept the money for whatever reason it is I'm sure there's some reason to it. Probably because there is some insurance type thing in place where they are getting that money from. I just don't understand why OP can't accept that and move on with their life lmao it's bat shit insane to me.

[-] MentalGymnastics@sh.itjust.works 6 points 4 months ago

Normally there would be another growing sector to relocate the more overstaffed department but there isn’t.

Knowing Amazon quite well, there definitely are sectors that are seriously deficient even new emerging ones within Amazon seem deficient.

It wasn’t painless, far from it, but the point was that unions couldn’t stop it, not that it was fair or nice.

I agree it wasn't painless in fact there is a high suicide rate within the computer sciences field. In fact it probably still isn't painless. I also agree unions are useless but some government regulation wouldn't be.

That just is.

Yea everything is. Until it isn't.

[-] MentalGymnastics@sh.itjust.works 23 points 4 months ago

They'll say the work is not needed. That's because the workload gets pushed to whoever is left. Is there a way you go from 110k employees to 20k and have no workload increase at all without some suffering some deficiencies somewhere in the product. Doubt it.

Another thing is who decides what the employees work on. "Industry hasn't innovated in x years" okay that's on CEO/management they decide what products to invest time in. It seems all that's left are barbarians in these companies. Possibly the visionaries have long been layed off it seems?

view more: next ›

MentalGymnastics

joined 4 months ago