[-] Naatan@lemdro.id 8 points 11 months ago

I think the point is that they should be accessible to people without “luxury” budgets.

I refuse to pay 30k plus for a car that I only need to get me from point a to b. Not everyone is a car fanatic.

Pricing is very much the problem if they want wider adoption.

[-] Naatan@lemdro.id 71 points 1 year ago

Doesn't this constitute insider trading? Sincerely hope some redditor takes them to court.

[-] Naatan@lemdro.id 21 points 1 year ago

Every day New Yorkers and Americans lost millions, including their entire lifesavings.

Look, I hope these people get their money back cause this sounds messed up, but maybe also don't invest money that you can't afford to lose. ESPECIALLY when it comes to crypto.

[-] Naatan@lemdro.id 26 points 1 year ago

Their terms of service have to be compliant with local laws though. You can't just put whatever you want in there and expect it to stand up in court.

[-] Naatan@lemdro.id 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

By your logic, the first humans should've stopped having kids and died out the first time they faced any sort of existential issue. Life's hard yo, that doesn't mean it's not worth living.

[-] Naatan@lemdro.id 8 points 1 year ago

You need to give articles making predictions about the future a heavy amount of doubt. We may be relatively intelligent as a species, but I genuinely think we way over-estimate our abilities. Predicting the future is hard. The biggest problem is that predictions are based on past data, and cannot account for what might happen that hasn't happened before. Which when faced with a brand new problem tends to be a brand new response.

Look at our lives right now. While certainly not ideal (who could make that claim, in all history?) it's pretty damn nice if you look back in time. Yes lotsa awful stuff MIGHT happen, but that's always been true. And compared to the challenges of the past it's not on any scale we haven't been on before (I mean the Cold War literally could have resulted in the planet becoming uninhabitable due to nukes).

I'm not saying I disagree with you, I'm merely trying to give it a glass half full perspective. I agree some scale of societal collapse does seem like it is a real possibility, but it's by no means guaranteed or necessarily even likely. We don't know what we don't know. Embrace not knowing what the future holds and just enjoy life for what it is today.

[-] Naatan@lemdro.id 108 points 1 year ago

I really wish my generation was a bit more optimistic. Yeah shit sucks, don't get me wrong. But have you guys seen all of history? This is par for the course. Yeah the challenges are different but every generation had their challenges. And yeah baby boomers definitely had it better than us, but that doesn't mean there's nothing but bad stuff to come. You have to take life with the good and the bad and make the most of it.

[-] Naatan@lemdro.id 7 points 1 year ago

But that's plain fantasy at this point. The current form of AI is fundamentally not intelligent. Advancement of the current form of AI won't change that.

The current form of AI is like the speech center of your brain. On its own it does not constitute a brain, nor will it ever "evolve" to be its own brain.

So the current form of AI may end up forming a small part of the whole, but that whole is as of yet still a fantasy.

[-] Naatan@lemdro.id 7 points 1 year ago

For me personally it's not that I want to downplay it, it's that I want to balance the scales. I see far more over-estimating of AI happening than downplaying.

The current form of AI is great as a tool and sadly there are definitely jobs out there that are nearly completely replaced by this tool. But that scope isn't about to change much based on where we are currently at. Many jobs require actual intelligence to make judgment calls, and the current form of AI just isn't going to cut it here as it has no real intelligence.

Of course, that won't stop dumb business leaders from still trying to use AI here, but that's an error in judgment that imo will correct itself over time.

[-] Naatan@lemdro.id 14 points 1 year ago

Heavy doubt on this one.

There is still so much misunderstanding on the state of AI and its potential based on current technology (spoiler: reduce your expectations significantly). How can you expect anyone to make predictions with such misunderstanding.

That said it kinda seems like a financial crash is already happening, regardless of AI.

[-] Naatan@lemdro.id 13 points 1 year ago

On another note, we’ve noticed the concerns raised about Cities: Skylines II performance

Cities: Skylines II is a next-gen title, and naturally, it demands certain hardware requirements

In light of this, we still think for the long-term of the project, releasing now is the best way forward

You do the math.

[-] Naatan@lemdro.id 40 points 1 year ago

This just plain isn't true for the vast majority of engineers. And exceptions occur in any industry. Focus your anger on billionaires and companies rather than your peers.

view more: next ›

Naatan

joined 1 year ago