They are missing some punctuation where it was desperately needed but imagine a comma or period after " spiders are not bugs" and reread.
NeverNudeNo13
joined 2 years ago
And several times throughout the story you are forced into making some "decisions" about how to deal with stale memory registers.
Invisible creatures by the dead astronauts.
Classic despotic propaganda. The US has never applied sanctions against food for any country.
This is like saying well my neighbor is starving my kids. How? Because my neighbors have made it so expensive for me to buy weapons to threaten them that we can't afford food any more.
Just absolute clownish nonsense.
I was really hoping for a spatula city ad and was not disappointed... Now I have to go watch UHF... Brb...
This is the silliest shit I've ever discussed on the Internet. I will say kudos to you for keeping things mostly amicable. It's been awhile since I've had an argument on topicality and it's been entertaining for me. Thanks my friend, best wishes.
Velocity is not suggestive because it is defined as speed in a direction.
In your example you are only taking speed, assuming direction and stating velocity.
That's not how legal systems work... Plenty of things are legal in one place and illegal in another. No Christians are worried about blasphemy against Zeus or Jupiter. Like wise a Zoroastrian is only concerned about blasphemy against Ahura Mazda and not Allah.
Okay... Which one? It's pretty clear that decaffeinated coffee violates no religions that I'm aware of... And in fact for some religions would be the only allowable way to drink coffee. And if you argue that I just meant in general that it is a slight on to any God then how would you interpret that as anything other than humor or sarcasm?
Do you always feel like a victim or is it just when you aren't caffeinated enough?
Opinions, such as "all methods of decaffeinating coffee are blasphemy" are subjective in their very nature. What makes this more obvious is that the definition of blasphemy is entirely subjective and can't even begin to be assessed objectively until at very minimum a religious dogma is declared for the basis of evaluation.
That's because words on their own all have definitions. The subjectivity is created contextually. I swear it feels like I'm talking to a bot.
Alternatively you could stick with the theme established by the first two stats and say that constitution is throwing a tomato really far repeatedly.