This is the silliest shit I've ever discussed on the Internet. I will say kudos to you for keeping things mostly amicable. It's been awhile since I've had an argument on topicality and it's been entertaining for me. Thanks my friend, best wishes.

Velocity is not suggestive because it is defined as speed in a direction.

In your example you are only taking speed, assuming direction and stating velocity.

That's not how legal systems work... Plenty of things are legal in one place and illegal in another. No Christians are worried about blasphemy against Zeus or Jupiter. Like wise a Zoroastrian is only concerned about blasphemy against Ahura Mazda and not Allah.

Okay... Which one? It's pretty clear that decaffeinated coffee violates no religions that I'm aware of... And in fact for some religions would be the only allowable way to drink coffee. And if you argue that I just meant in general that it is a slight on to any God then how would you interpret that as anything other than humor or sarcasm?

Do you always feel like a victim or is it just when you aren't caffeinated enough?

Opinions, such as "all methods of decaffeinating coffee are blasphemy" are subjective in their very nature. What makes this more obvious is that the definition of blasphemy is entirely subjective and can't even begin to be assessed objectively until at very minimum a religious dogma is declared for the basis of evaluation.

You both are saying the same thing...

I mean I'm all for old guys flexing old guy knowledge. But I honestly feel sort of stupid for even trying to correct this one because it seems so fruitless.

Software lineage does have some interesting things in it and one of my favorite infographics is the Linux variations family tree they have over on Wikipedia. But I don't see any inherent value in tracking where browsers came from and who begot who from the biblical sense.

Back in the day this produced some really large controversies and led to heavy litigation... https://www.theringer.com/tech/2018/5/18/17362452/microsoft-antitrust-lawsuit-netscape-internet-explorer-20-years

But now a days you really just need to decide what is important to you and find the right browser. Performance, compatibility, privacy, customization, integration... Etc... there is a browser for pretty much any application you can think of and generally speaking you are going to have some massive give and takes between them. No such thing as a perfect browser, though Links probably got the closest. 😆

It wasn't, this guy hasn't a clue... Its original name was Firebird and they changed it to Firefox at version 3's release. You could argue that it is somehow related to the Mozilla browser since it came from a related team but the Mozilla Foundation was also responsible for SeaMonkey as well.

Mosaic was completely unrelated, same with netscape.

What do you think WMD means with regard to types of weaponry?

You need to reread my original reply.

Also here you go bud... https://www.isis-online.org/publications/iraq/iraqs_fm_history.html

GF

Iraq produced various chemical weapons and had production warheads in various configurations including for their Short Range Ballistic Missile platform.. Production was suspended in the 90's. Many of these warheads are still present in Iraq today within sealed vaults which ISIS attempted to gain access to within the last five years.

Also... Yes they absolutely did pursue enrichment of uranium per their IAEA announced plans for a nuclear power program...

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/us-secretly-takes-yellowcake-from-iraq/

You probably want something like netgenius one. That's enterprise grade but might be a good starting point to research. Alternatively you could look at ips/ids systems that can apply a set of definitions or rules to the analysis, ubiquiti or fortinet has some solutions for this sort of thing but I'm sure there are alternatives out there which would be better depending on your needs.

You are kind of asking several questions here though and may need to clarify a bit what goal you have in mind for the solution you are looking for.

This has been standard military science for the last 5000 years.

If you want conflict to end at some point in the future then you don't let it slowly ramp up with a whole bunch of tit for tat.

You have to win decisively in order to have any opportunity for peace. Or you know... HAMAS could have just not started a war by killing a bunch of civilians and taking innocent people hostage... That would have probably worked too.