Ok, how do we solve that? More markets? Based on what you said above, that sounds like your solution.
I'm of the opinion that workers need ownership of the companies they work for instead of capitalist ownership, but that's just me. After all, they're the ones doing the work by definition.
Can you answer the question? Either one because the latter would at least be funny.
OK, there's market economies everywhere. Why is wealth so unequally distributed, within those countries and globally?
Yes, but they said it is "the most efficient way to enrich the proletariat". Market economies can be fine but to place the emphasis on it being the driver is just silly.
And you can be wrong about that last sentence.
You ignore the unequal exchange and imperialism of developing nations the US dominates. Those people are workers too.
It's all projection
Is the bottom one actually something or is this a prank to get us to squint really hard at a bun
This and you aren't allowed to say bad things about Israel.
Disagree. The US imploding would do a ton of good for the developing world.
Zionism is an ideology, Jews are an ethnicity / religion.
Nazism is an ideology. Germans are an ethnicity.
Plenty of people can be nazis or zionist without being in the in-group explicitly, and vice versa.
Zionism is modern day fascism.
It seems fine but I had to check the "order" and it seems like it's color(6) / origin(7) or maybe purpose(9). https://7esl.com/order-of-adjectives/
I don't think it sounds off enough that someone would call it out.
Edit: I had to dig deeper, apparently you could consider it a "noun adjunct" which means it would be valid.
Opposing Israel is cool. Wish more countries would do it