Eh, I think you're thinking about nuclear fission? The guy you replied to was talking about nuclear fusion.
Niello
joined 2 years ago
That's not really what OP is saying though? They're talking about corporate efforts to make it seems like the consumers are the problem, not them, and many are still falling for it. As long as the awareness of this is not raised and more people aren't pointing fingers at the corporates the whole don't buy their product is never going to be effective, same for advocating for regulations (rather, especially the regulations). You're assuming everyone knows the root of the problem already, but that's just not the case here.
i'll take country defederation dramas over the shit we have now any day.
That's .ml admins
You sure it's just 5 years ago and not before that? I could have swore his pitiful ego ate out his brain at least a decade ago.
And because WhatsApp isn't popular throughout since there are also regions that almost exclusively use LINE or very heavily adopted Telegram. Not everyone uses Instagram but it's a popular choice for the kind of service it offers all over the world.
Doesn't Threads app have direct access to browsing history as well? I feel like that's another can of worm that could probably use some further explanation on.
What you said is the equivalence of putting all the eggs in one basket, which is a pretty silly use of the human resources available.
It's probably more meaningful to ask at this point what data can he collects that he's not collecting.
And it's perfectly normal for technology to advance and become more effective and efficient over time.
Other problems with your post aside, you think it's good enough to emit less but not worth it to actively invest in getting the excess carbons out? The problems they are solving overlap, but they are not the same set of problems.
Wonder how much of it is because of Threads and how much of it is from making the site inaccessible without accounts and the rate limit.