Peck

joined 2 years ago
[–] Peck@lemmy.world 15 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Although I agree with the sentiment, I would NEVER expect anybody to entertain my kids. I would just pack them up and gone home. My kids are my burden to bear.

[–] Peck@lemmy.world 5 points 4 days ago (5 children)

Exactly. I was on an empty flight red eye PDX to Boston. Didn't get cancelled, but what sucked that they didn't have first class, so I still had to be crammed into those tiny seats. Couldn't sleep as always.

[–] Peck@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

So they get compensated about quarter of their yearly expenses with this btw bill. If they had an equivalent of this in us I'd get about 6k yearly from gvmt for each child. Not too shabby in my book.

[–] Peck@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

This article talks about cost "relative to its GDP per capita." In the proposal they give flat sum of money. So we are comparing Apple to oranges. Not saying you're wrong, but I still would like to know how much is daycare per month in China. I know in us I pay 2k per month. I doubt it's the same there.

[–] Peck@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago (4 children)

In US I assume. How much does childcare cost in China?

[–] Peck@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

The problem with Intel is itself. No amount of laying people off has helped them in the past. Nothing suggests that it will this time either. Pumping money into this thing without major changes will lead to more money hemorrhaging with no significant benefit.

The place is a classic definition of toxic work environment.

[–] Peck@lemmy.world 103 points 2 months ago (6 children)

Hot take. Fireworks are stupid and disruptive.

[–] Peck@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

Manny of them don't want to live there. Those micro homes are just for show. Always have been.

[–] Peck@lemmy.world 17 points 4 months ago

That's a good threat, but what happens when nobody backs it up? You just know that establishment Dems will sit it out and people are not going to do anything. So what then?

[–] Peck@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Very interesting. Thanks for sharing. I do get a feeling that you mean walking for pleasure. Although that's important, it's much more important doing chores and going to work. That means that your destination is predetermined and your ability to avoid unpleasant and dangerous sections is limited.

[–] Peck@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago (3 children)

Funnily enough I've lived in all 3 categories of these places.

Rural: no sidewalks and large distances. Walking is usually impractical because of distances and lack of sidewalks. Your house is most likely right on the side of the local road. To get anywhere your real option is biking, but cars go fast on these road. You better not be caught at night or on heavy rain, because some grandma is going to take you out. Many times people were shouting at me from cars passing by, one time threw an empty can, couple times some wrappers and stuff.

Suburban: walking most likely is an option as is biking. If you are lucky, there are sidewalks, but I'm my case there were large portions of the road without sidewalks. Even worse sometimes short route takes you through intersections that aren't easily navigable by pedestrians. No lights, slip lanes etc. it's very uncomfortable walking or biking on such roads for long time. Your best option is to try to find circuitous route through neighborhoods and only cross major roads when needed. That increases travel time by a lot at expense of higher safety and keeping your hearing. Fewer shouts from the car, but they happen still.

Urban: that's the most walkable setup. The only one I really recommend. I've lived in what considered a very bad part of town and managed to walk to store and gym with no problem. But I'm a guy and was young then, so your milage might vary.

view more: next ›