The downside of allowing them is that the community may get flooded with USpol posts that are as of now hard to filter on Lemmy. So I vote to keep them out. However, to stop getting all those reports on what right now are considered unwritten rule violations (at least by some of the community) I strongly suggest to make more explicit rule on this in the sidebar.
On a sidenote, does abbreviating 'pronouns' as 'PNs' not make more sense than writing 'PPs'? For obvious reasons. 🤦♂️
Similarly to Dutch.
And Wikipedia confirms that I was closer to the truth: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Elder_Scrolls_V:_Skyrim
I see. BTW, I never figured out the details either, but wanted to bring matters up anyway in case it still would be considered useful.
The joke in this chain of replies is, that "70s" ain't the 1970s. Please see @ours@lemmy.world comment writing "BC?" and @No_Eponym@lemmy.ca rolling with it. Unless you meant to answer @CazzoneArrapante@lemm.ee.
Time and place, phneutral. Time and place.
Oh I certainly agree.
Cute. 🐿️
Nice photo, thanks for sharing.
That is Donald Duck, not Daffy.
Ooh, Nixon's wife. i looked up the name of Kissinger's spouses but I had not considered that the joke referenced the then-president's wife.
Peter1986C
joined 1 year ago
For AV1 that could still be okay, lol. It would be kind of meh for e.g. H264 but YT does not even use that anymore AFAIK.