Nah I matched the tone of who I was responding to.
A person on the internet whose mother minored in meteorology doesn't agree with scientific consensus! How do we move forward now?
Honestly, it's an oversimplified view on reality. The US is incredibly good and incredibly bad. Just like most countries.
The argument over which country is better is like arguing philosophy. The argument has merit in lifting up both sides. But to say America is bad is sophmoric at best. It comes across like a petulant child.
Like a ham sandwich?
With slander, you have to prove the statement is false and that it caused damages.
Super easy when a news organization says a voting booth was rigged by Hugo Chavez and quit using your company. Not so easy when the guy that spouts nonsense spouts nonsense and ABC news actually reports it. Could be argued his nonsense pays the electric bill at ABC.
I mean, they say the best defense is a good offense.
Why minimize the death of a protestor for a movement most of the world agrees with? It's kind of heartless.
This looks like a pretty normal statistical distribution. Just glancing at it. What makes you think it's thousands of fake votes? I'm genuinely curious what you are seeing.
Fighter of the Nightman?
It makes total sense in America. Here we would have shot him before he was dead though.
Business days are important because that's when people work, and would be there to find them. And what's to excuse? Wells Fargo didn't kill em. People die, if you find a company that makes you immortal let me know.