Player2

joined 2 years ago
[–] Player2@sopuli.xyz 3 points 2 years ago

The space shuttle was never meant to be 'reusable' but rather 'refurbishable.' The big difference is that Starship is designed from the ground up for rapid reusability, without manually checking each of the 24000 unique tiles of the STS orbiter.

With the stainless steel construction, SpaceX is aiming to use their new upper stage up to 3 times a day with only refueling and a basic check in between. It is a complete paradigm shift from traditional rockets.

[–] Player2@sopuli.xyz 17 points 2 years ago

Look at the Falcon rocket history. They started out at a very similar point, though at a smaller scale. And yet now they are comfortably human rated. They have landed the last 171 times in a row without fail, with another one coming this evening to add to that incredible number.

The guy at the helm is a terrible person, but this does not discredit the absolutely insane progress they have made.

[–] Player2@sopuli.xyz 10 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

You're comparing the world's first fully reusable rocket that also happens to be the world's most powerful operational rocket to old technology? The payload capacity of this vehicle is immense. There is not a single aspect of it that isn't brand new, from its proportions, engine power cycle, engine amount, construction materials, you can go on almost endlessly.

These incremental tests are what allow them to move at this incredible speed. Traditional rocket development doesn't take years, it takes decades. You have to consider that this isn't a government trying to outcompete another one, it's a private company. They are pushing the envelope with everything they're doing.

[–] Player2@sopuli.xyz 7 points 2 years ago

While the mission was similar in thrust profile to an orbital one, it was not an orbital mission. The vehicle broke down and landed about an hour after launch.

[–] Player2@sopuli.xyz 22 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (4 children)

Primary objective was to get further than last time, which they absolutely did. Not only were all the engines reliable for their first burn, they tested a successful hot separation, in flight ignition, and effective flight termination system. All of this was on top of the achievements they made last time and allowed Starship to reach space for the first time, making it reach past the N1 in only two attempts.

It was a great success.

PS. No it did not explode in orbit. The actual rocket scientists did think about this you know. The flight plan featured a suborbital track, and it splashed down safely in the ocean somewhere along it's predicted path at most about an hour after launch.

[–] Player2@sopuli.xyz 7 points 2 years ago

Well for me it is not really that much of a hyperbole, I consider being able to access the files on your own device pretty much a necessity. Yes it is absolutely no problem that protections like this are enabled out of the box, but it should all be optional, even if that process is kind of difficult (disabling by connecting to a computer and doing some sort of configuration for example).

Maybe I'm just upset because an update recently broke Android/data access and forced me to look for a new workaround for 30 minutes (to access my own files on the device I supposedly own!)

[–] Player2@sopuli.xyz 8 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Those engines were beautiful

[–] Player2@sopuli.xyz 26 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Well sounds like they didn't go far enough then, they should cut all internet access so that users don't accidentally download malicious apps!

A user that wants full control of their own device should have that option available. There is no good reason Android makes it difficult to access its data folder for example for users that do want to mess around with that stuff.

[–] Player2@sopuli.xyz 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

"Game time started"

[–] Player2@sopuli.xyz 13 points 2 years ago

Maybe I just hate change, but isn't it much more difficult to differentiate between grass and water with the new colors? I find myself really preferring the old version, though I am used to it

[–] Player2@sopuli.xyz 11 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Most likely part of 'urban commercial' and the housing sections

[–] Player2@sopuli.xyz 9 points 2 years ago (2 children)

The position on the diagram is arbitrary, it just shows the proportion of land use type

view more: ‹ prev next ›