[-] PreachHard@mander.xyz 5 points 1 year ago

From my understanding MOND has some pretty big hurdles to overcome as a model. When speaking to my PHD friend he still feels it's hammering away at a model to further fit observations; it might prove useful but is certainly no smoking gun for us to wave a flag that we're onto something. It's a 40 year old concept that hasn't born much fruit yet.

https://www.arxiv-vanity.com/papers/1112.1320/

[-] PreachHard@mander.xyz 7 points 1 year ago

Exactly all the hype started after the game released and people banged on about how fucking amazing it is. Nearly 200hrs later and I concur.

[-] PreachHard@mander.xyz 6 points 1 year ago

Also you reset your taste buds and come to realise how greasy and sugary everything is that you don't make yourself or eat out at a nice place.

[-] PreachHard@mander.xyz 7 points 1 year ago

Wow that was definitely an enlightening read on the etymology, so the word was fucked from the get go haha..

Sean O’Conaill (1976) - 'I would not suggest such a thing were it not for the Whatabouts. These are the people who answer every condemnation of the Provisional I.R.A. with an argument to prove the greater immorality of the “enemy”, and therefore the justice of the Provisionals’ cause: “What about Bloody Sunday, internment, torture, force feeding, army intimidation?”. '

[-] PreachHard@mander.xyz 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I believe that was the original intent of the word, just wondering if it's essentially defunct because of how it's used now.

[-] PreachHard@mander.xyz 31 points 1 year ago

Another casualty of the American market.

[-] PreachHard@mander.xyz 6 points 1 year ago

I know it gets used like shit but do you think there's any utility in the term 'whataboutism' if the definition is strict? Like I always understood it to be pointing out ludicrous pontificating about things that'll never happen. Obviously that's not how it's used at all in reality and your description is much more apt.

[-] PreachHard@mander.xyz 5 points 1 year ago

When you say "no room to make business." That's where I think the fundamental disagreement is rooted. Socialism is inherently built on the idea that what you are building in a capitalist system is exploiting labour. The people you bring in should have ownership of the company too in a socialist system, not the state. What you're describing is a communist dictatorship. State programs should be run by the state just as they are in most countries now. You certainly don't want companies running your government.

[-] PreachHard@mander.xyz 5 points 1 year ago

Yeah that or distant relatives

[-] PreachHard@mander.xyz 4 points 1 year ago

People forget that it was the bakers that got it first at the start of the French Revolution.

[-] PreachHard@mander.xyz 12 points 1 year ago

This reads like an ad straight from the 60s lol

[-] PreachHard@mander.xyz 2 points 1 year ago

I think the one Birra Moretti does isn't too bad either

view more: next ›

PreachHard

joined 1 year ago