Primarily0617

i'd interpret that as half-way to weekly, or once every two weeks

anonymising data is a treadmill problem

what might work now won't hold up to the de-anonymising techniques of a few years from now

so no, you can't really

you can't "anonymize" data

ask the people outed as lgbt by netflix's anonymized data set

a random blog post isn't an authoritative source on the matter

maybe try again?

selfish and lazy

you're the one who doesn't want to look it up for themselves though...?

burden of proof is on you and offer evidence for your claims

source?

And "the highest price before it’s too expensive and loss of sales cuts into revenue" is higher in a monopoly than a duopoly. Meaning the "highest cost" is higher in a monopoly than a duopoly.

As an addendum, you haven't really mentioned anything past a vague idea of "maximum cost" until now, so I'm not really sure what you mean about repeating yourself. Are you okay, friend?

So "highest cost" isn't set by "what the consumer is able to spend"? So what's it set by?

if that's how you want to define "highest cost", then goods absolutely aren't priced at highest cost in a duopoly

they aren't even priced at highest cost in a monopoly, because "all the money a person has" is just cartoon logic

I don't know what this means

The "highest cost possible" is higher in a monopoly than a duopoly.

My point being that while a duopoly may seem like a worst case scenario, it very much isn't.