1
submitted 6 months ago by RehRomano@lemmy.ca to c/wine@lemmy.ca
1
submitted 8 months ago by RehRomano@lemmy.ca to c/wine@lemmy.ca
48
submitted 10 months ago by RehRomano@lemmy.ca to c/canada@lemmy.ca
1
submitted 10 months ago by RehRomano@lemmy.ca to c/wine@lemmy.ca
59
submitted 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) by RehRomano@lemmy.ca to c/canada@lemmy.ca
165
submitted 10 months ago by RehRomano@lemmy.ca to c/canada@lemmy.ca
1
submitted 10 months ago by RehRomano@lemmy.ca to c/wine@lemmy.ca
1
submitted 10 months ago by RehRomano@lemmy.ca to c/wine@lemmy.ca
17
submitted 11 months ago by RehRomano@lemmy.ca to c/canada@lemmy.ca
95
submitted 11 months ago by RehRomano@lemmy.ca to c/canada@lemmy.ca
1
submitted 11 months ago by RehRomano@lemmy.ca to c/vancouver@lemmy.ca
1
submitted 11 months ago by RehRomano@lemmy.ca to c/vancouver@lemmy.ca
[-] RehRomano@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I can’t understand how people look at PP

If you’re the average Canadian and your rent has doubled or tripled, groceries have jumped 50%, and your health care system is collapsing in the last 8 years since Trudeau took power isn’t desperately wanting any alternative an obvious reaction? Many districts are effectively a two party race and if your only goal is to ensure Trudeau isn’t PM, the Cons are your only options.

I’m not saying Pollievre will make any meaningful difference, but at the very least he’s been saying our housing system is broken. Trudeau’s had 8 years and things have only become much worse.

[-] RehRomano@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 year ago

You live in hell?

[-] RehRomano@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 year ago

And after paying all that money you still have to live in London 😔

[-] RehRomano@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I have no love for the Liberals but this is indisputably good policy for incentivizing rental supply. Gotta give credit where it's due.

[-] RehRomano@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 year ago

I need you in every housing thread I post here.

[-] RehRomano@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 year ago

The point of this article is we can and should make room in Toronto. There’s plenty of space if we accommodate with a better built form that isn’t sprawling detached homes.

[-] RehRomano@lemmy.ca 26 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

“let’s tear down everything here that all the existing residents chose and replace it with something else that we think is more logical”.

This feels like a dishonest interpretation that misses a lot of the nuance presented in the article.

[-] RehRomano@lemmy.ca 38 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Subsidizing homeowners with a taxpayer-funded cheque for $500 is regressive policy for a leftist party. Even if we're means-testing it, there's so many better ways that money could be spent.

Once again, as a renter dealing with year over year increases of hundreds of dollars per month, I get nothing.

[-] RehRomano@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 year ago

How much empty housing do you think exists in canada’s largest cities?

[-] RehRomano@lemmy.ca 27 points 1 year ago

"dealing with" is a charitable way to describe "pacing around my apartment desperately trying to avoid thoughts of existential dread"

[-] RehRomano@lemmy.ca 16 points 1 year ago

Fighting this with regulation is a losing battle. The mobility revolution is already here. The long-term solution is to build more mobility lanes to accommodate.

[-] RehRomano@lemmy.ca 28 points 1 year ago

lol a temporary boycott with an explicitly defined timeframe of two days. Yeah that'll show them.

view more: next ›

RehRomano

joined 1 year ago
MODERATOR OF