Rhoerii

joined 1 month ago
sorted by: new top controversial old
-1
DNI Tulsi Gabbard gives exclusive glimpse of President Trump's first Cabinet meeting (www.foxnews.com)
-9
Chilean gang burglaries spread across US, prompting new warnings (www.foxnews.com)
Uncovered: Massive $27 Billion Climate Scam Implicating Stacey Abrams, Kamala Harris, and Other Top Democrats in c/Conservatives@hilariouschaos.com
[–] Rhoerii@lemy.lol -1 points 1 month ago

I didn't write the article.

Uncovered: Massive $27 Billion Climate Scam Implicating Stacey Abrams, Kamala Harris, and Other Top Democrats in c/Conservatives@hilariouschaos.com
[–] Rhoerii@lemy.lol -1 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I like what trump is doing.

-22
Lawler: DOGE Is Doing a ‘Comprehensive Forensic Audit’ of the Federal Government (www.breitbart.com)
Uncovered: Massive $27 Billion Climate Scam Implicating Stacey Abrams, Kamala Harris, and Other Top Democrats in c/Conservatives@hilariouschaos.com
[–] Rhoerii@lemy.lol -1 points 1 month ago

Correct!

Uncovered: Massive $27 Billion Climate Scam Implicating Stacey Abrams, Kamala Harris, and Other Top Democrats in c/Conservatives@hilariouschaos.com
[–] Rhoerii@lemy.lol -1 points 1 month ago (6 children)

“Popular” doesn’t mean worthwhile.

But you not liking something doesn't make it unworthwhile. There are plenty of people who do like it, and it's worthwhile to them.

I'm one of them. Stop trying to force your opinions on me.

0
‘President of Peace’: Elise Stefanik to Tout Trump’s Case for Nobel Peace Prize, Call for ‘Global DOGE’ at CPAC (www.breitbart.com)
-1
‘President of Peace’: Elise Stefanik to Tout Trump’s Case for Nobel Peace Prize, Call for ‘Global DOGE’ at CPAC (www.breitbart.com)
Uncovered: Massive $27 Billion Climate Scam Implicating Stacey Abrams, Kamala Harris, and Other Top Democrats in c/Conservatives@hilariouschaos.com
[–] Rhoerii@lemy.lol -1 points 1 month ago (8 children)

My dude, you don’t have to post it.

My dude, you don't have to read it.

If you don't like what post, then you don't have to click on the links. Me posting stuff I find interesting doesn't negatively affect your life at all.

If you're unhappy with the news I post, feel free to post your own links. You can do it just as easily as i can.

The sites I post from are extremely popular have have tons of readers. If they are so bad, then how come they are so popular? Because not everyone has your same fucking opinion. Get over yourself.

For fucks sake, learn some internet literacy.

Uncovered: Massive $27 Billion Climate Scam Implicating Stacey Abrams, Kamala Harris, and Other Top Democrats in c/Conservatives@hilariouschaos.com
[–] Rhoerii@lemy.lol -1 points 1 month ago (10 children)

Conservatives and deeply questionable sources; is there any more iconic combination?

You don't have to listen to either one. Feel free not to click on the article.

-1
Uncovered: Massive $27 Billion Climate Scam Implicating Stacey Abrams, Kamala Harris, and Other Top Democrats (www.beckerbrief.com)
-2
Trump vows to cut off state's federal funding after it refuses to comply with executive order (www.foxnews.com)
3
Report: Top Social Security Administration Official Steps Down After Conflict with DOGE (www.breitbart.com)
-4
Education Department Slashes $600M for ‘Divisive’ Teacher Training Grants (www.breitbart.com)
-10
DOGE Investigating Potential Social Security Fraud — Millions Aged 130+ on Rolls (www.breitbart.com)
Anyone here old enough to miss 1980's computer days? in c/casualconversation@lemm.ee
[–] Rhoerii@lemy.lol 1 points 1 month ago

Yep! I remember seeing an ad in Omni magazine that showed someone sitting at a computer. And in big bold print it said, "Imagine being able to read the news with just a few clicks of a keyboard!" Then going on to say someday that may happen.

And boy did it ever. But what's so funny that ad seemed so futuristic and cool. Now we do it from our pocket. Crazy.

I still have that magazine by the way. I should dig it out and scan that ad!

Anyone here old enough to miss 1980's computer days? in c/casualconversation@lemm.ee
Anyone here old enough to miss 1980's computer days? in c/casualconversation@lemm.ee
[–] Rhoerii@lemy.lol 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

A/S/L

I legit got laid doing that in aol chatrooms. One girl I ended up dating for 4 years. Met her in aol chat room. Started with a/s/l. Met her at the food court in the mall. Kissed her at her car. She moved in with me a month later.

Good times. I ended up being clever as fuck in chat. Thankfully women like humor and wit more than looks. It's the only reason I got laid then and the only reason I get laid now. haha

1980's Commodore 64 battlestation in c/cassettefuturism@lemm.ee
[–] Rhoerii@lemy.lol 1 points 1 month ago

As someone pointed out, this turned out to be a rendering.

Anyone here old enough to miss 1980's computer days? in c/casualconversation@lemm.ee
[–] Rhoerii@lemy.lol 1 points 1 month ago

I was totally into the that art scene! lmao I'd even print that shit out on my dot-matrix printer!

1980's Commodore 64 battlestation in c/cassettefuturism@lemm.ee
76
1980's Commodore 64 battlestation (lemy.lol)
 
24
Anyone here old enough to miss 1980's computer days? (lemy.lol)
 

It was so fun back then. Not the yelling and moaning we have going on today.

Here on Lemmy, even in non-political discussions some is always whining about the current president or whatever.

Or calling for alt voices to be banned.

Back in the 80's computer stuff and conversation was more fun and not so freakin' political.

It was about games, DYI, trying to learn to hack, learning the new tech. It was awesome!

I was part of it, but not as much as I could have been because I was in a small town and couldn't afford a lot. But I def had a foot in the scene, and it was awesome!

view more: next ›