[-] Ronin_5@lemmygrad.ml 30 points 10 months ago

They never mention Israeli interference

[-] Ronin_5@lemmygrad.ml 26 points 10 months ago

China unintentionally making games good.

I was playing genshin like a job when it came out. If I didn’t do my dailies, I’d fall behind with the content and pay IRL money to catch up.

Eventually I just quit because it wasn’t fun to play.

12

If you click the countries tab, you’ll find a table with countries, and the number of cases as a respondent state vs cases that corporations in their state have taken out against foreign states.

If you put it in excel, and sort by largest number of cases as a claimant state, you’ll find that the US, the Netherlands, and the UK as the biggest exploiting countries. (Which actually explains how the Netherlands got so rich, their tendency for nationalism, and why the bourge was pushing so hard for brexit)

Sort by most cases as a dependent state and you’ll find that Argentina, Venezuela, Mexico and Egypt as the countries that are the most exploited.

Some countries like Spain and Russia are both exploiting and exploited. China has surprisingly few cases despite the breadth of its operations.

6
6

There’s nothing I love more than using company time to analyze stats. Today’s subject of analysis is the income distribution in the US.

We can tell who the bourge are, from where their income comes from. I’ve highlighted the boxes showing that the top 10% (of households) gets most of their income from business earnings and dividends.

Similarly, we can see the massive difference in monthly income from the 70-80% bracket to the 80-90% bracket to be 3400/mo, and the jump from labour aristocracy to the bourge to be 21000/mo, generated through capital and the exploitation of labour.

Information is from BEA. Search “distribution of personal income”.

The accuracy of these figures are corroborated by Table 2, showing annual mean household income to be $106,000. I have no idea why the popular narrative is that median household income is $76,330.

[-] Ronin_5@lemmygrad.ml 34 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Completely wrong in thinking this is what Americans want. The state will only act in bourgeois interests.

4
submitted 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) by Ronin_5@lemmygrad.ml to c/firearms@lemmygrad.ml

The methodology to calculate the level of penetration of a projectile has is to divide its momentum by its area. This number is then squared to make a kind of penetration index. The units are (J*g/m^2)/m^2. An alternate way is to multiply kinetic energy by sectional density, and divide by cross sectional area.

It should be noted that this simplification holds true for harder materials that’s not assumed to deform, like tungsten carbide penetrators.

https://www.longrangehunting.com/attachments/penetration0802-pdf.274645/

What I then did is watch a whole bunch of YouTube videos and took note of which calibers, at which velocities, penetrated the level 4 plates.

What I learned was that not all plates rated at level 4 are made the same. And there are some plates which are rated higher than level 4. My findings are below:

Please note that the different values come from different barrel lengths, bullet weights and velocities.

In summary, a bullet needs to be 1. Made of a tungsten penetrator with a copper jacket. 2. Have a penetration index of greater than 2800.

Or

  1. Made of a hardened steel penetrator (>60 hrc), 2. have a penetration index > 3200.

You’re not penetrating any armour with lead bullets.

Note 270 WSM is off the charts. If this round is given a tungsten carbide or steel penetrator, of which you can shape using electro-discharge machining, then it has the capacity to penetrate level 4 armor at range. The length of the cartridge also makes it easier to design semi auto and auto firearms. (Shorter stroke length) though its bulk suggests less ammo capacity.

https:~//m.youtube.com/watch?v=czCgWDuHHOY

Also note that the PLA can make an effective tungsten AP round in their standard caliber without needing any equipment upgrades. (Unlike the US) Though their current copper/steel round isn’t effective with level 4.

Now look up who’s the world’s leading manufacturer of tungsten.

As a final note, most law enforcement or military wear level 3 or 3+ plates, because it’s half as heavy as level 4. So this analysis is probably overkill.

14
submitted 11 months ago by Ronin_5@lemmygrad.ml to c/firearms@lemmygrad.ml

Level 4 armour plates are specifically designed to protect against armour piercing rounds without pass through. This is the most advanced type of personal protection we have, and it’s important we understand the technologies behind it, especially in CQB and urban warfare environments.

It is currently able to withstand a M80A1 and m2AP bullet pushed to >3000 fps in a 300 winmag cartridge. The M80A1 round is a non-lead round that’s normally pushed to 2600 fps in a 308 cartridge. The M2AP contains a steel penetrator. But because the bullet diameters are the same, this YouTuber loaded it in a 300 winmag to give it even more energy and velocity.

https~://m.youtube.com/watch?v=KHFJ5Gdmy8s

What has been proven to work is a tungsten carbide penetrator seen in the M993 round. Penetration is seen when reaching 2600 fps on some plates and 3000 fps on other plates.

https~://m.youtube.com/watch?v=_edfr1i6LMU

https~://m.youtube.com/watch?v=yH8Sls4hxoo

The US has fielded a new rifle shooting a new caliber, the 6.8x51. As the video shows, it is able to defeat level 4 armour in two shots without AP rounds, with standard non-lead ammo.

https~://m.youtube.com/watch?v=BGL9wP8_-LI

Using a steel-backed casing, it’s able to use a fast burning powder to push a 140 gr bullet to 2900 fps in a 13” barrel. Higher velocities and longer effective range against armour can be achieved with a longer barrel.

To be continued.

22
How to choose a gun (lemmygrad.ml)
submitted 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) by Ronin_5@lemmygrad.ml to c/firearms@lemmygrad.ml

So, you want to buy a gun. Which gun should you buy? There are so many!

To answer that question, you first need to answer: which caliber are you shooting? And to answer that, you need to answer the following:

**What are you shooting? **

Squirrels? Coyotes? Deer? Elk? People?

**What distance? **

20m? 50m? 100m? 300? 800? 1000? 3000?

Let’s start with what. Choosing what you want to shoot will determine the distance.

If it’s squirrel and small game up to the size of a bunny, it would take only roughly 10 ftlbs of energy to dispatch. However, it presents a very small target, so you would need to be up close or very accurate. Small game can only be reliably taken up to 100m.

So, viable calibers include rimfire calibers, air rifles and shotgun pellets. A well set up slingshot can produce 6-8 ftlbs of energy, which is barely enough to take small game.

Coyote and deer necessitates a larger cartridge. Generally they need 100 ftlbs of energy to take down reliably. And even then, shot placement is crucial. So, this moves you up to pistol calibers, straight wall cartridges, and intermediate cartridges. Some air rifles meet this requirement.

Humans fall within this category.

Because of a larger hit area, the maximum range is moved out further to 500m. Though if full sized or magnum cartridges and/or specialized guns are used, this can be pushed out to 1 km.

Larger deer and elk necessitate at least 1000 ftlbs of energy. This moves you up to full sized cartridges like 308 Winchester, 7.62x54R, 30-06, 7mm winmag, etc. At this point, the range is dependent on your accuracy. But if a magnum cartridge like 338 lapula or 6.5 PRC is used, it can be pushed further.


Cartridge and accuracy.

Faster moving, slimmer cartridges are more accurate than their fatter analogues of similar energies. I’m not entirely sure of the sciences behind it, but it is a trend I’ve noticed.

17 hmr is more accurate than 22 wmr.

223 is more accurate than 7.62x39

30-30 is more accurate than 45-70

6.5prc is more accurate than 308.

More accuracy not only means longer range, but also means you can punch above its weight class, as you can more effectively target organs.

However, heavier bullets are more accurate at longer distances because they negate wind.

So, if you want the ultimate accurate bullet, then it needs to be long, fast, and heavy, like the 50 bmg.


guns and accuracy

The more money you spend, the more accurate your gun will be.

What you’re spending money on is the following:

  1. Precise chamber tolerances. How the chamber holds the bullet and how it precisely and accurately aligns the bullet with the rifling has a big effect on accuracy. Not only should the chamber consistently align the bullet the same way every time (precision), but the axis of the bullet should be at the same angle and with zero offset to the axis which it’s going to be rifled (accuracy).

.

  1. Crown. The end of the barrel and how it terminates. How well the crown is made affects accuracy greatly

.

  1. Action and cycling. Whether it’s bolt or semi-auto, loading rounds from a magazine, when too much force is used, will deform the round and misalign the axis of the bullet from the axis of the cartridge. The accuracy standard is bolt action and hand fed loading is considered the most accurate.

The reason that semiautomatic is considered to be less accurate than bolt is that to increase reliability, the design of the chamber is looser, and the action and cycling is performed with more force than bolt action.

  1. Stock, ridgity and resonance. I’m going to consider this the final item because it doesn’t affect accuracy all that much. But as your gun shoots, the forces the bullet imparts will resonate the barrel, and cause it to slightly deform. And increasing the ridgity of the stock will cause it to deform the same way every time, giving it more consistency. This is also where barrel length comes into play. A longer barrel will resonate more, but a shorter barrel will result in a slower, less accurate bullet

Accuracy and you. Expectations and practice

If you’re into fun culture, you’ll encounter 1 moa as the standard for accuracy. This is a lie. Most guns you get off the shelf will typically shoot 2-3 moa on average with bulk ammo. That’s including bolt actions and precision rifles.

If you want to get sub-moa, then not only will you need a precision rifle, but also either match grade ammo or custom reloaded ammo suited to your gun. For rimfire, you’ll need to do extensive testing to find the type of ammo that shoots best. And even then, it’s rare to find a pairing that shoots below 1 moa.

The point of saying this is: don’t get upset because you’re not getting tiny groups. It’s probably not you, it’s how your gun is set up.

So how do you actually shoot a gun accurately?

Avoid using your muscles as much as possible. The more you use your muscles, the shakier you are in aiming. Every joint between the earth and the gun is a source of deviation. So if you can, lean against something to steady your aim. prop your gun up using branches or tables. Use something solid like spare magazines to prop up the stock if you’ve already rest the barrel.

If you don’t have anything to rest against, I recommend the crossed legged sitting position. You’re essentially leaning against your legs, which stabilizes your upper body, as long as you’re able to relax all your muscles.

If you don’t have time to get into position, you can use something called the hasty sling, where you use the sling to pull the gun against your arm, and you can relax some muscle groups to get a more accurate shot.

But nothing beats practice.

[-] Ronin_5@lemmygrad.ml 81 points 11 months ago

Horrible artist. But he’s right.

As soon as NK confirmed that they have ICBM nukes that can hit US territory, the US backed off in their hawkish rhetoric.

[-] Ronin_5@lemmygrad.ml 50 points 1 year ago

Such is western liberalism; the only correct action is to be subjugated under imperialist rule. Only then will you deserve pity, and pity is all you’ll get.

[-] Ronin_5@lemmygrad.ml 41 points 1 year ago

I don’t know if you’ve watched Kung pow, but there’s this guy who gets beat up on purpose and thinks he’s winning, and it turns out that he was trained wrong as a joke.

I’m getting the same feeling here.

[-] Ronin_5@lemmygrad.ml 25 points 1 year ago

That’s exactly the opposite of what capitalists want, explicitly or implicitly

[-] Ronin_5@lemmygrad.ml 25 points 1 year ago

No big loss. I didn’t know about the rest of lemmy until about a week ago.

[-] Ronin_5@lemmygrad.ml 44 points 1 year ago

A lot of people struggle to define exactly what is fascism, but that’s because it’s just capitalism, but intensified. If you had to give a definition, it’s imperialism turned inwards.

[-] Ronin_5@lemmygrad.ml 36 points 1 year ago

But seriously you should learn economics. It’s so fucked up when you’re looking at it with class consciousness.

[-] Ronin_5@lemmygrad.ml 25 points 1 year ago

Crime is directly related to not necessarily poverty, but income inequality. So in a given area where class contradictions are intensified, there will be more crime.

Also note that correlation is not causation. One theory regarding causation is that this is the fallout of COINTELPRO, when the CIA and local police had disrupted revolutionary movements to prevent unification against capitalism, through provoking infighting and promoting drug abuse.

In other words, crime is artificially increased to create a lower class, and contradictions within the proletariat are exacerbated to prevent unity.

[-] Ronin_5@lemmygrad.ml 36 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

There isn’t a middle ground in a lot of discussions. It’s just that the correct and just course of action is intentionally hidden behind fear and prejudice. Have you ever wondered why nobody ever talks about policies as class interests (discuss who would benefit and why these policies are pushed) in mainstream media, as if it’s taboo?

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=H4D1wI6wGjU

So if you call yourself a centralist, then sorry to say, but you are either intentionally or unintentionally ignorant.

view more: next ›

Ronin_5

joined 1 year ago