[-] RuikkaaPrus@lemmy.ml 32 points 5 months ago

JavaScript is crazy. While you are learning React.js or Vue.js you are learning Webpack, Rollup or Vite.js even without your consent :skull:

[-] RuikkaaPrus@lemmy.ml 11 points 8 months ago

Firefox is better than most, no double there, but at the same time they do have some shady finances.

I'm not going to refute this because it seems to me that article are right in several points. Also, we have to be honest, Mozilla is kind of stupid sometimes.

But if you care about the default search engine or privacy settings, you really just need to do some hardening and tweaks to make it very private in general. Chromium doesn't have any of these settings, it even doesn't have RFP btw.

and they also do stuff like adding unique IDs to each installation.

Looks like you can download Firefox through the Mozilla's official HTTP/FTP repository that doesn't trigger this ID token generation. Also this article motivates people to download Firefox installer from Softonic's page:

Firefox users who prefer to download the browser without the unique identifier may do so in the following two ways:

  1. Download the Firefox installer from Mozilla's HTTPS repository (formerly the FTP repository).
  2. Download Firefox from third-party download sites that host the installer, e.g., from Softonic.

Softonic have a really nice and privacy respectful privacy policy (obviously that's not the case) in contrast with randomized pretty anonymous unique ID triggered by Firefox installer download. Mozilla's generated ID feels more like a download counter than a tracker indeed.

I'm not trying to justify the Mozilla's problems. They makes silly things sometimes, but being realistic, they do a better job taking care of their users privacy more than Google or even Brave.

27
submitted 10 months ago by RuikkaaPrus@lemmy.ml to c/privacy@lemmy.ml

This post is not related other previously published posts. But I want to know your opinions.

This debate does not focus on "which technology is better" or "which has better support", rather it focuses on which of these two technologies seems more acceptable in terms of privacy policy and user information management (on his respective toolchain, compiler, etc).

33
submitted 10 months ago by RuikkaaPrus@lemmy.ml to c/privacy@lemmy.ml

There are no "news", but I'm worried about this business actually. I'm in knowledge that post already exists but I'm not clear at all.

Resuming: Google is trying to add telemetry to Go's toolchain (such as .NET and Dart/Flutter). It also added the GOPROXY environment variable that uses the Google's Go proxy to... Just collect more user data?

I'm a pretty beginner Go dev, but I'd like a toolchain without these telemetry or at least some instruction of how to opt out this thing.

Sorry for repost, but I don't find enough information in any other place. :(

23
submitted 10 months ago by RuikkaaPrus@lemmy.ml to c/privacy@lemmy.ml

Okay, it may sound like a personal issue, but I disagree with the privacy practices in developer tools. And I'm not talking about VSCode issue, but about other more elemental development tools. For example, the privacy policy of npmjs.com, pkg.go.dev (Google's privacy policy lol), hub.docker.com, and these public registries for developers, have some questionable privacy practices as well.

I wanna know your opinions about.

[-] RuikkaaPrus@lemmy.ml 5 points 10 months ago

YOOOO LOOK AT DIS BARBIE! I found these fishes inside the car

[-] RuikkaaPrus@lemmy.ml 12 points 11 months ago

Mu wey. Ya, salte del camino, al chile.

mexican_cow

31
??? (lemmy.ml)
submitted 11 months ago by RuikkaaPrus@lemmy.ml to c/dankmemes@lemmy.ml
39
submitted 11 months ago by RuikkaaPrus@lemmy.ml to c/dankmemes@lemmy.ml
29
submitted 11 months ago by RuikkaaPrus@lemmy.ml to c/dankmemes@lemmy.ml
20
The bible (lemmy.ml)
submitted 11 months ago by RuikkaaPrus@lemmy.ml to c/dankmemes@lemmy.ml
22
submitted 11 months ago by RuikkaaPrus@lemmy.ml to c/privacy@lemmy.ml

Yeah, I'm sure this is a pretty newbie question, but here I go:

What ammount of telemetry have Flutter by default? And there is a way to deactivate it? I wanna learn this technology to develop some Mobile Applications, but I'm (honestly) worried about this, because you know, Google dirty techniques, etc.

[-] RuikkaaPrus@lemmy.ml 4 points 11 months ago

Imma nut 🥵 🔥

[-] RuikkaaPrus@lemmy.ml 48 points 11 months ago

No way, she made the authentic brainless people trap

[-] RuikkaaPrus@lemmy.ml 9 points 11 months ago

I cannot say anything about this because I'm that cringe too

[-] RuikkaaPrus@lemmy.ml 27 points 11 months ago

Bro, he literally transformed a company and social app in his personal edgy microblog called X

186
submitted 11 months ago by RuikkaaPrus@lemmy.ml to c/dankmemes@lemmy.ml
88
£1199.99 (lemmy.ml)
submitted 11 months ago by RuikkaaPrus@lemmy.ml to c/dankmemes@lemmy.ml
[-] RuikkaaPrus@lemmy.ml 25 points 11 months ago

Fully based

[-] RuikkaaPrus@lemmy.ml 9 points 11 months ago

Plus Reddit Ads Personalization are'nt avoidable anymore

[-] RuikkaaPrus@lemmy.ml 4 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

These are pretty good news! Thank you for explain in a better form the context of situation.

Actually, sounds cool. Now feel sure I can run cs1.6 no steam with 18 trojans detected by VirusTotal from a pakistani server and don't scare me because I will use Bottles into a Arch Linux Virtual Machine lmao (this is just a sarcasm, in any case, I also bought cs1.6. I think there are only hackers anyways)

[-] RuikkaaPrus@lemmy.ml 5 points 11 months ago

Because Bottles is distributed via Flatpak, which is...

Safe. Sandboxed.

Because...

Your bottles are isolated from the system and will only hit your personal files when you decide.

The full-sandbox is provided and pre-configured only using the Flatpak package (highly recommended).

All other packages still have access to the partial sandbox which isolates the bottle files and prevents them from accessing your homedir.

(This is a extract from the official homepage in the last section)

12
submitted 11 months ago by RuikkaaPrus@lemmy.ml to c/linux_gaming@lemmy.ml

I already have heared about Bottles sandboxing capabilities, but, how this differs from standard Flatpak sandboxing system? Is really secure execute any Windows Software using Bottles? (yes, every machine have his vulnerabilities blah blah)

36
submitted 11 months ago by RuikkaaPrus@lemmy.ml to c/dankmemes@lemmy.ml
view more: next ›

RuikkaaPrus

joined 1 year ago