SamuelRJankis

joined 1 month ago

For the Adblock users portion I'm merely saying if people didn't want to see ads because it diminished their web browsing experience the user generated content could be handled the same.

Even going away from the misinformation discussion some people are just cunts and provide little value to begin with. So I'm happy to be done with them at least on the internet.

[–] SamuelRJankis@sh.itjust.works 25 points 1 day ago (8 children)

I don't mind blocking them as something to do today but society really needs to figure out what they want to do with this stuff long term.

From a user level I believe having a Adblock type shared lists that block crappy accounts like the one circulates this stuff would be pretty nice.

She follow almost every maga account you can think of. As soon as you follow her Instagram will start suggesting stuff like this

[–] SamuelRJankis@sh.itjust.works 43 points 3 days ago (4 children)

Don't think I saw it mentioned here but the lady seems to be ultra maple maga.

Source: https://www.instagram.com/jasminemooney

Ideally you'd just post a archive link in the future.

[–] SamuelRJankis@sh.itjust.works 21 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

As things stand I'll generally tolerate those people assuming they're on the right side of things now(e.g. not voting for people with Trump ideology). Certainly seems like we need the support.

They should understand trust is a lot easier to lose than to earn.

Eby looking east, rather than south, for future power sales.

Danielle Smith is going to be in Florida at the end of the month to fundraise for a American right wing media company. Placing to much faith in Alberta seems like a bad idea.

Post Media article. Seems to be a rising amount of these here.

It is a topic exclusively reported from the article author and I don't see anything questionable within the contents although I'm not familiar with the topic.

[–] SamuelRJankis@sh.itjust.works 28 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

It was technically to protect more of our once close trade partner (America's) auto industry.

It should be revisited.

Pretty much the same as always in Canadian politics. The previous party was bad we'll just ride this one till they become intolerable then go back to the other one. Any other party would be unfathomable.

[–] SamuelRJankis@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

He says he was puzzled that the party had deemed him “unworthy” or “unqualified” to run for the party in a community he’d served provincially for three decades

His previous tenure is exactly why I don't think this guy should ever have a government position of any kind again.

Yes that's what I was getting at.

It's actually kinda amazing he seems to have never gotten into the whole "wokeism" thing Pierre and Rustad still peddles to this day as one of society's greatest issues. Although I'm glad Pierre is to dumb to stfu with the idiotic rhetoric.

 
 
 
 
view more: next ›