Seminar2250

joined 3 months ago
[–] Seminar2250@awful.systems 4 points 1 week ago

this is going to take up the rest of my evening, now i'm reading about the Pólya conjecture for the first time

this rules 💗

[–] Seminar2250@awful.systems 10 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

what worked for me teaching an undergrad course last year was to have

  • in-class exams weigh 90% of the total grade, but let them drop their lowest score
  • take-home work weigh 10% and be graded on completion (which i announced to the class, of course)
    • i was also diligent about posting solutions (sometimes before the due date

it's a completion grade after all) and i let students know that if they wanted direct feedback they could bring their solutions to office hours


it ended up working pretty well. an added benefit was that my TAs didn't have to deal with the nightmare of grading 120 very poorly written homeworks every four weeks. my students also stopped obsessing about the grades they would receive on their homeworks and instead focused on ~~learning~~ the grades they would receive on their exams

however, at the k-12 level, it feels like a much harder problem to tackle. parental involvement is the only solution i can think of, and that's already kind of a nightmare (at least here in the us)

[–] Seminar2250@awful.systems 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

is the deniability you are referring to of the clanker-wankers (CW^[unrelated, but i miss when that channel had superhero shows. bring back legends of tomorrow]) themselves or the clanker-producers (e.g. sam altman)?

because i agree on the latter^[i.e., someone like altman would say "you're prompting it wrong" to skirt accountability or create an air of scientific/mathematical rigor], but i do see CWs saying stupid shit like "there is more to it than just writing a description"

edit: credit, it was @antifuchs who introduced the term to me here

edit2: sorry, my dumbass understands your point now (i think). if i wank clankers and someone tells me "that shit doesn't work," i can just respond "you must have been prompting it wrong". but, i do think the way many users of these tools are so sycophantic means it's also a genuine belief, and not just a way to escape responsibility. these people are fart sniffers, after all

[–] Seminar2250@awful.systems 10 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (5 children)

people who talk about "prompting" like it's a skill would take a class^[read: watch a youtube tutorial] on tasseomancy because a coffee shop opened across the street

[–] Seminar2250@awful.systems 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

This is an excellent sneer, thank you for sharing! <3

[–] Seminar2250@awful.systems 4 points 3 weeks ago

wish i had thought of this before clearing out my inbox 😞

[–] Seminar2250@awful.systems 5 points 3 weeks ago

hackneyed; stale

[–] Seminar2250@awful.systems 7 points 3 weeks ago (7 children)

you seem like the kind of dork whose brain literally explodes when you read this sentence

[–] Seminar2250@awful.systems 7 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

clanker

edit: this may be used to refer to the chatbots themselves, rather than those who fondle chatbots

[–] Seminar2250@awful.systems 5 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

holy shit how have i never heard of this paper

thank you for sharing!

[–] Seminar2250@awful.systems 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

this is gonna live in my head forever without paying any rent and i am upset

view more: next ›