overview for SnowyLocksmith

Migrating from ARM to X86 by SnowyLocksmith in c/main@selfhosted.forum

[-] SnowyLocksmith@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago

Thank you for the confirmation buddy

Migrating from ARM to X86 by SnowyLocksmith in c/main@selfhosted.forum

[-] SnowyLocksmith@alien.top 2 points 1 year ago

Thanks a lot for the detailed explanation

Migrating from ARM to X86 by SnowyLocksmith in c/main@selfhosted.forum

[-] SnowyLocksmith@alien.top 2 points 1 year ago

I have never really built an app, so I don't really know, but most of the docker containers I have used use some kind of linux base in the image. So then, since the config data is mounted as a volume, should its format be decided by the linux image, i.e. it should be more or less standard, right? Mostly the developer builds an app in some language, which are CPU agnostic.

Migrating from ARM to X86 by SnowyLocksmith in c/main@selfhosted.forum

[-] SnowyLocksmith@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago

Interesting bit about the byte order. Question though, I have a disk formatted with ext4. Now, both on an arm device and a x86 device, the files on this disk are perfectly accessible. So why would this not apply to docker config data?

Migrating from ARM to X86 by SnowyLocksmith in c/main@selfhosted.forum

[-] SnowyLocksmith@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago

Yes, I know that. I am just curious if the files containing the data of previous images will work with the new images as well?

1

Migrating from ARM to X86 (alien.top)

submitted 1 year ago by SnowyLocksmith@alien.top to c/main@selfhosted.forum

13 comments fedilink

Hello All,

I currently have a home server on a raspberry pi 4 with all my services running as docker containers. All containers have their own directories containing the config and database files. This makes it easy to backup and export then.

However, in the future I have plans to migrate to a more powerful server. This means I will probably not be using a CPU with an ARM architecture. So effectively, I will also have to use the corresponding docker images. So will this new x86 docker image work with my backup docker config volumes?

1

Need your help to determine if this this possible (Wireguard, External Access) (alien.top)

submitted 1 year ago by SnowyLocksmith@alien.top to c/main@selfhosted.forum

0 comments fedilink

Hello selfhosted community, I need help figuring out some things.

So I have a server running multiple services, and everything works perfectly. For remote access, I use tailscale with "Subnet Router" and "Exit Node" features, that basically makes it so that I'm connected to my home network whenever tailscale vpn is running.

Now I want a selfhosted version of this. Since, I'm behind a cgnat connection, I have create a compute instance on Oracle Cloud as that provides a static IP. However, following a the guide I have seen to make wireguard bypass cgnat (https://github.com/mochman/Bypass_CGNAT) , it seems that:
- This system makes it so that everything coming into the vps is passed thorugh to my server.

- The ports for the proxy manager need to be exposed in the vps.

Is it not possible to create a setup that will do essentially the same thing, but only works when I have wireguard turned on on the client device? I do not want the vps to be accessible on the internet to everyone