Soyweiser

joined 2 years ago
[–] Soyweiser@awful.systems 2 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Know it was a blog, so I meant my post as a bit of a joke, as this isn't any proof of a general FT hate. (but like all jokes, it isn't just a full joke, as I have noticed that a lot of financial media like FT (there is also a dutch tv show for example) randomly can be a lot more pro 'leftwing' financial stances (I mean the more left-liberal/socdem ones, not full blown fully automated gay luxury space communism) than you would expect (This is also a bit of a blindspot for a lot of more online leftwingers).

[–] Soyweiser@awful.systems 11 points 1 month ago

That whole 'haters just like incomplete information' makes no sense btw. Amazing to get that out of people basically going 'we hate beff for x,y,z' (which I assume happens, as I don't keep up with this beff stuff, I don't like these 'e/acc' people).

[–] Soyweiser@awful.systems 5 points 1 month ago

Sorry, I have not kept up with the guy, and that is why I made the silly joke. Thanks for pointing out what actually happened. And hey, at least star citizen is still trying to chug along (despite my own reservations. feels weird to agree with Smart), so those non-nft pictures of spaceships will prob outlive the nfts.

[–] Soyweiser@awful.systems 7 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Being very mad about starcitizen.

[–] Soyweiser@awful.systems 9 points 1 month ago (6 children)

People might not be aware but places like FT seem to really dislike the techbro people

[–] Soyweiser@awful.systems 10 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (5 children)

Yeah thats Derek allright, the man has a bit of a reputation for being argumentative and opinionated. And well with his extensive resume ( he made Battlecruiser 3000AD in 96) he has the right to speak on things, and we should be silent, listen and be in awe of the wisdom he bestows upon us. A living Prometheus, slowly back away, do not make eye contact or he will start a flamewar.

[–] Soyweiser@awful.systems 8 points 1 month ago

Ah so that is good news, worried it might be offline due to legal troubles, but it is technical troubles. Thanks for all your (and everybody else involved) service an all that.

[–] Soyweiser@awful.systems 4 points 1 month ago

it was written in latex

Of course it was. (I enjoy LaTeX myself but still, it is a type of person)

[–] Soyweiser@awful.systems 5 points 1 month ago (5 children)

on how trying to make programming languages easier in some ways is doomed to fail

This is prob right, but the 'in some ways' part does a lot of work here. Think the issue is that some complexity can be removed without problem, and some absolutely cannot. And the problem of figuring out which is which is hard. (Which if you squint, seems to be similar to the chemistry stuff you describe here). With software it (as far as I can tell) is also quickly that bigger projects need bigger teams, and that adds a lot of communication problems, and as a non-stacking process you can't just add more programmers to make stuff go faster (compared to for example building a building, which can be sped up a lot more with just more workers) as these communication problems remain. From what I heard is that this, and the problem of maintaining software on a large scale is what Java was trying to fix. Which is why all programmers love Java. It is a language for enterprise scale projects. (On that note, which is also why a lot of reason people hate Java for the wrong reasons, a lot of the hated stuff makes sense if you recall it is made for enterprise scale projects/teams etc. It is an attempt to make those projects easier (lets leave it in the middle if that attempt worked or not (Do think it is amusing that Minecraft of all things was coded in Java by a single person (initially))).

Interesting our community seems to attract a few outspoken chemistry people. Not something I know much about, know somebody who does something with crystal chemistry machines, and when he technically talks about it I'm happy I understand about 30% :).

[–] Soyweiser@awful.systems 17 points 1 month ago

I'm sorry why did you make the robot so sexy?

[–] Soyweiser@awful.systems 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

looks up from recording my new mathematically speaking 'a podcast for the new thinking man' podcast

A phew, I was worried for a moment there.

E: Apologies, it is real I should have googled it. I know nothing of the podcast, I just tried to make a 'this is what a Rationalist/logic bro would name their podcast' joke. Ow god he even has an episode about conflict theory (but in contrast to Scotts post on conflict theory he actually talks about a historical mathematician so not the same thing, but that was a moment of double take). There is also an Adam Allred who is a 'masculinty speaker' or something, who is also into AI, Maga and everything else of course, but not sure if they are the same person (nope different people, turns out if you are called Adam Allred you are forced to make a podcast). But the math podcast Adam seems to be a good guy who is pro lgbt/BLM etc. (He did get his twitter account hacked which is now spamming people).

[–] Soyweiser@awful.systems 7 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Unrelated to my recent posts on sciencefiction, and not sure if this is something I should ask here publically but it is the easiest place I could think off. But @dgerard@awful.systems is Rationalwiki dead or not?

view more: ‹ prev next ›