[-] Talisker@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago

Because fascists can always move father right. You can’t out Republican the Republicans.

[-] Talisker@lemmy.world 39 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Weird that this has to be explained this late into the game but…

Trump is running on the promise of enacting fascism and using state power to mete out retribution to the ‘undesirables’ that his voters blame for their lack of power. To this end there is nothing he can say or do that will make them not vote for him. He is promising power and as long as he wins his promise is kept.

Kamala is running on a platform of ‘not fascism’ and to that end she does need to provide a coherent alternate worldview to mindless retribution. It’s not enough for her to walk the middle of the road and say as little as possible. She needs to give people a diametrically opposed worldview. She needs to be capable of explaining why fascist retribution isn’t good or helpful. She can not just be a diet Republican. She needs to have coherent answers to their obvious bullshit.

Hope this helps. Horrifying that the people who are a decade into Trumpism and ostensibly responsible for stopping it don’t seem to have the slightest clue what motivates it or how to counter it.

[-] Talisker@lemmy.world 17 points 3 weeks ago

Does it? Or does it boil down to whether or not you are willing to rubber stamp the death of your loved ones.

When it’s theoretical gamesmanship people like you are more than willing to act like dispassionate chess masters but I have a hard time believing that if it was your family getting killed you would be so cavalier.

[-] Talisker@lemmy.world 17 points 3 weeks ago

Easy to say when it’s not your family getting slaughtered.

But we all know you’re a paragon of rationality who would enthusiastically vote for an administration who has promised to kill your family because your love of lesser evilism outweighs anything else.

[-] Talisker@lemmy.world 15 points 3 weeks ago

Probably not. But it doesn’t include your consent at the very least.

Maybe you’re a perfectly objective person who can still vote for your families execution. But I think most people would struggle with it, if they’re being truly honest with themselves.

[-] Talisker@lemmy.world 21 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Your vote is your consent.

Imagine for a minute that your perfect political candidate was running. The only catch is that if they win they are promising to personally execute your family in front of you. The other guy is gonna kill your family too so everyone tells you to stop being such a single issue voter and vote for the lesser evil.

Do you still vote for them? Or do you refuse to participate in the execution of your family?

[-] Talisker@lemmy.world 16 points 3 weeks ago

Just not big enough for the left, naturally.

[-] Talisker@lemmy.world 12 points 3 weeks ago

I believe all promises that are made within the last 30 days of an election!

[-] Talisker@lemmy.world 21 points 4 weeks ago

Did they forgive new debt or are they just discharging debt that legally should already have been forgiven?

[-] Talisker@lemmy.world 5 points 4 weeks ago

Haha yeah the government that’s currently enabling war crimes is gonna totally make a commission to hold presidents liable for crimes.

This is why nothing changes. If you start looking at one of them you have to look at all of them.

[-] Talisker@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago

We want Israel to win and we want Ukraine to be an expensive quagmire for Russia.

[-] Talisker@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

Nice article but it just makes me wish I had the financial security to pursue something like this. I’ve got a good job, even.

view more: next ›

Talisker

joined 1 month ago