Telemachus93

joined 2 years ago
[–] Telemachus93@slrpnk.net 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

I've been lurking on r/thedeprogram for about two years and have seen Smith's opinions on landlords there multiple times, and upvoted into the ~~thousands~~. Pretty sure you don't know what you're talking about.

Edit: high hundreds, not thousands.

Sadly, my internet connection where I'm at is abysmal and lemmy doesn't let me upload some examples. Fun fact though: OP's meme was posted on theDeprogram two years ago.

[–] Telemachus93@slrpnk.net 2 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Tankies also love to rub Adam Smith's opinions under liberals' and conservatives' noses...

[–] Telemachus93@slrpnk.net 4 points 1 month ago

Not OP. I've been using Ecosia for years and was glad they didn't do the AI summary shit so far... But a few days ago I got an AI summary on Ecosia as well. I fear they're also hopping on this train and in that case I'll look for another search engine.

[–] Telemachus93@slrpnk.net 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

In other languages that shouldn't be equal either though, right?

Maybe you meant

if (2){
console.log("nonzero ints are truthy")
}
else {
console.log("no they're not")
}

Which would output

nonzero ints are truthy

and that would actually work in all languages I know. But that's different from being equal.

[–] Telemachus93@slrpnk.net 7 points 1 month ago (4 children)

It's not. Just tried in my Browser Console:

2 == true // returns false
[–] Telemachus93@slrpnk.net 14 points 1 month ago

Mh, '0' is a nonempty string, so !'0' returns false. Then of course !(!'0') would return true. I'd absolutely expect this, Python does the same.

And the second thing is just JavaScript's type coercion shenanigans. In Python

bool('0') # returns True because of nonempty string
bool(int('0')) # returns False because 0 == False

Knowing that JavaScript does a lot of implicit type conversions, stuff like that doesn't strike me as very surprising.

[–] Telemachus93@slrpnk.net 12 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Nah, OpenOffice is close to death since about ten years and has known security issues. Go for only LibreOffice.

[–] Telemachus93@slrpnk.net 8 points 1 month ago

In a letter this month, Uthmeier warned publicly owned airports across the state that they must be in compliance with the new law, which requires public airports to report planes with weather modification devices to the state, and suggested that weather modification may have triggered the flooding in Texas.

“Because airports are most likely to catch those who seek to weaponize science in order to push their agenda, your compliance with these reporting obligations is essential to keeping our state safe from these harmful chemicals and experiments,” Uthmeier wrote this month.

So airports now have to report every fossil fuel or fuel cell* airplane and only purely battery-electric planes are allowed? Have fun shutting down every Florida airport. ;)

  • (due to water vapor emissions)
[–] Telemachus93@slrpnk.net 5 points 2 months ago

It's definitely easier to electrify maritime transport.

Long-range aviation might not be electrified at all because it's so hard to get enough energy from batteries without making the plane unable to lift off due to weight, or enough power from fuel cells without taking too much space. Instead we might see hydrogen turbines or synthetic fuel engines.

Either way, maybe we should ask ourselves if a future society should have flight at all? Of course it's cool that humans were able to achieve flight but right now it mostly serves an overheated capitalism and the short-lived pleasure-seeking of (globally speaking) a few fortunate people.

[–] Telemachus93@slrpnk.net 9 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I disagree with the "the technology is already there" statement. Source: I was part of an aviation electrification research project.

Small regional planes are technologically possible, yes, but transatlantic or transpacific flights? We're nowhere close to that.

[–] Telemachus93@slrpnk.net 30 points 2 months ago

Also: Nobody should be treated like that no matter if anyone depends on them like that.

[–] Telemachus93@slrpnk.net 4 points 3 months ago

I'd love to upvote, but come on, that "Master of puppets" devilish Netanyahu just screams "antisemitic clishés". We don't need shit like that to criticize genocide and zionist propaganda.

view more: next ›