[-] TheLepidopterists@hexbear.net 32 points 10 months ago

Everyone knows what you meant, but it's an ecofascist talking point, and doesn't engender respect for you.

[-] TheLepidopterists@hexbear.net 26 points 11 months ago

You're supporting an actual segregationist who broke a huge strike and calling people who don't think he's pro union "segregationists?"

Do you realize how absurd you sound?

[-] TheLepidopterists@hexbear.net 24 points 1 year ago

If you don't want to talk to someone from Hexbear don't reply to someone from Hexbear'd comments for a start.

Of course since you're not OP it's really not your place anyways to say which instances can and can't respond to them.

[-] TheLepidopterists@hexbear.net 22 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Okay so if being "authoritarian" is bad and means you shouldn't be supported, and Sankara ran a state, making him authoritarian, by a definition you're now agreeing with (again, anyone who runs a state) why are you pretending you don't think he's an authoritarian and trying to use him as a cudgel against people who actually share an ideology with him?

[-] TheLepidopterists@hexbear.net 23 points 1 year ago

I think that authoritarian is a basically meaningless term when applied to a states.

All states are in the business of using lethal violence, or the threat of it at least, to enforce their rule within their borders.

[-] TheLepidopterists@hexbear.net 29 points 1 year ago

It's a good policy for sure.

[-] TheLepidopterists@hexbear.net 21 points 1 year ago

God could the point go over your head harder. That user wasn't engaging in a conspiracy theory that Jews on all the banks movies and government, they were comparing your apparent belief that the Chinese government controls the American government to those antisemitic conspiracy theories.

Also zero points in an argument with a bunch of people who can't downvote farquaad-point

[-] TheLepidopterists@hexbear.net 27 points 1 year ago

I'm almost certain they can, I think they just lack the posting power of hexbear-shining

[-] TheLepidopterists@hexbear.net 30 points 1 year ago

How should Russia have defended their allies, the DPR and LPR without attacking their aggressor's supply lines?

Can you think of any wars in which both participants didn't attack least try to attack military supply chains?

[-] TheLepidopterists@hexbear.net 26 points 1 year ago

They've been shelling and raiding the Donbas, which you consider to be independent, for about 9 years.

Surely you are aware of this, it's pretty essential background on a political topic that you are highly opinionated about.

[-] TheLepidopterists@hexbear.net 24 points 1 year ago

It doesn't seem like you do given you referred to the current war as an invasion by Russia and Ukraine has been shelling it's neighbors the LPR and DPR for nearly a decade.

Can you clarify why Russia shouldn't be involved in the war between Ukraine and its smaller neighbors?

[-] TheLepidopterists@hexbear.net 22 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Until you actually clarify everyone is going to assume you're mad that you can't say the n-word and are a huge bigot.

EDIT: at this point, even if you clarify, I personally will assume you're just covering your ass

view more: ‹ prev next ›

TheLepidopterists

joined 3 years ago