It's one happy meal, Ellen. What could it cost, $25?
TrainsAreCool
joined 2 years ago
That way, in a few years, they can announce a bigger commitment for positive PR that they have no intention of keeping.
"Corporate commitments to environmental problems turn out to just be fluff for positive PR"
Really need to start taxing wealth, and not just income.
Someone told them the problem was just "too many variables", so they figured by taking away sensors, there are fewer variables. Therefore, better self-driving.
It's still nowhere near any standard we should expect to trust this technology, which is a flawed solution to a problem that doesn't really exist.
I believe a huge chunk of Tesla's valuation is based on their automation tech, despite having very little real success towards full automation. So they have to focus on that and try to prove they can deliver.
But I'm guessing they won't succeed, as there are fundamental flaws with the technology itself, that can't be solved by throwing more sensors at the problem.
This is the worst kind of discrimination; the kind against me!
This guy, probably
Starting to think that all war is crime.
Companies have lied to the public, hidden facts, and spewed propaganda for decades.
I think the public has every right to seize the assets and wealth of these companies as compensation.
The final hilarity would be Elon forcing Twitter to re-enable SMS based tweets, then hackers using it to fake tweets from Elon himself.