Unquote0270

joined 2 years ago
[–] Unquote0270@programming.dev 11 points 3 days ago

Wind your neck in bellend

[–] Unquote0270@programming.dev 1 points 1 week ago

Yes, the mullvad integration is essentially what I am trying to achieve because I cannot run both vpn and tailscale as they conflict. Unfortunately I need mullvad on other devices and have spare device slots I can use so it makes no sense to pay another $5 on top.

I was hoping that requests to the jellyfin port would get returned back through tailscale directly and anything else goes on to gluetun. The subnet option sounds like this would be the solution but I could be misunderstanding many things here.

[–] Unquote0270@programming.dev 1 points 1 week ago

Interesting, I will definitely give that a try, thank you.

[–] Unquote0270@programming.dev 1 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Is jellyfin going through mullvad? Jellyfin and tailscale are using host. This is part of a larger docker compose where I do have things running through gluetun.

Since your Tailscale is host network mounted, you’ll be able to expose your Docker network subnets over Tailscale then access Jellyfin. This is done via the TS_SUBNETS env variable. Docker will use a 172.16.0.0/12 subnet.

Thanks that sounds like what I'm after. So this means that I could access jellyfin on the 172.x.x.x address but anything else goes to the exit node (and then the vpn)?

[–] Unquote0270@programming.dev 1 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Essentially, I want to be able to use a vpn at the same time as tailscale when I am on my phone and away from home or connected to a hotel wifi etc. Android doesn't allow this but I read about tailscale exit nodes so I have set this up and it works. The issue is that I would prefer to not use my server location as the exit so I want to push traffic into gluetun (which I already have set up with other stuff running in it).

[–] Unquote0270@programming.dev 3 points 1 week ago (2 children)

You're either an ignorant fool or trolling.

[–] Unquote0270@programming.dev 2 points 2 weeks ago

It's not a festivity.

[–] Unquote0270@programming.dev 11 points 2 weeks ago

This. Watch This is England, it's essentially the same thing now, except a lot worse.

[–] Unquote0270@programming.dev 39 points 2 weeks ago (15 children)

Wtf.

It's sickening how the far right agenda has been so normalised that the government is pandering to them.

[–] Unquote0270@programming.dev 6 points 2 weeks ago

Hendy is a fucking joke, look at the saga he's conducting in Oxford. This idea is also a joke, I wouldn't believe it's serious if I had seen all the other completely messed up stuff happening in the UK.

[–] Unquote0270@programming.dev 8 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I haven't kept up with it all recently but previously almost all 'studies' were seriously flawed.

 

I'm just trying out Immich and I'm really impressed, seems to be exactly what I'm looking for except for one thing. I am looking for something that is a central library for my family so we can all access the same photos and all upload to the same place.

It looks like users can see other users' libraries but you lose the People functionality and perhaps a few other things.

What's the best solution? I'm thinking of just creating a generic user and giving the details for everyone to use but it seems a shame to lose the user functionality of individual passwords etc.

 

So I’ve finally decided to get a real rack and I’m looking for advice on a couple of areas. I will be making drone/dark ambient and I already have a digitakt, 0-Coast and NTS-1. I want the rack to create slowly evolving drones and textures which I can layer with the 0-Coast for fx/bass and the digitakt to play more textures, glitchy fx, or whatever sounds right. I also plan to use VCV for CV modulation and sent to midi which seems to be nice and easy with the Nifty case.

So far I have decided to get the Nifty case and Morphagene, along with FX Aid XL for big reverbs and probably Befaco Out v3. The areas I am undecided about are modulation, distortion, and perhaps utilities.

For modulation, I would like a few different LFOs that I can use with both the rack and with the 0-Coast. I’ve been thinking about Ochd + some kind of mixer because I love it in VCV and it seems hard to beat in terms of separate LFOs and footprint. But then, perhaps Maths might be better? I would get less choice of outputs from it vs Ochd but I could potentially do more with it?

For distortion, I really have no idea. I want it to be stereo in/out as I plan to use it before or after FX Aid but I don’t know what kind of distortion I need for creating filthy distorted pads/drones. I quite like VCV's Debriatus’ saturate and fold sections in VCV. I’ve been looking at Erica Synths Pico DSP since it is small, stereo and could be useful to have other fx when I don’t want distortion. I think I also want it to have some kind of tone/filter to tame it and make it dark.

For utilities, I don’t think I need a great deal, at least for this iteration of the rack. It looks like I can attenuate the inputs on Morphagene and I don’t really need to create envelopes for now, nor do I need sample and hold (although this might be handy later on).

So any advice on modules? I’m also thinking that a stereo mixer with a few different inputs might be useful so that I can route the digitakt (which will have the 0-Coast running through it) because I only really have a stereo output to my speakers/computer.

view more: next ›