UsernameHere

joined 2 years ago
[–] UsernameHere 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

the U.S. didn't want Haiti to succeed because it would have encouraged slaves in the U.S. to revolt

What’s your source on this?

[–] UsernameHere 43 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Arrest the police responsible with kidnapping charges.

[–] UsernameHere -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

dragontamer you still shilling for Toyota?

[–] UsernameHere -1 points 1 year ago
[–] UsernameHere -2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

So Communism is:

concept

classless

moneyless

stateless

achieved by Socialist states

takes a long time

never been achieved before

I wonder why it hasn’t been achieved before.

[–] UsernameHere -1 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Yes, I am talking about why you think Communism is the solution to inequality but it just hasn’t achieved it yet after centuries of existing.

Then you moved the goalpost to claim that communism has never been achieved.

So let’s talk about that now.

Why do you think Communism has never been achieved but at the same time think it is capable of solving inequality?

[–] UsernameHere -2 points 1 year ago (6 children)

Just because something hasn’t happened yet doesn’t mean it is guaranteed to happen in the future.

I didn’t think that I needed to explain that to you. I was wrong. Sorry.

I am not saying things can’t happen if they haven’t happened yet.

I am saying if Socialism and Communism have existed for centuries and that whole time they have had disparity. What reason is there to believe that disparity cannot exist in socialist or communist economies?

[–] UsernameHere -2 points 1 year ago (8 children)

If it just needs to be “based in logical progression of real systems” to achieve the goal, then why has it not succeeded yet after centuries of existence?

If I can take your exact same argument and use it against Capitalism in pre-revolution France

My argument that disparity is caused by people pursuing power and not economic systems?

Please explain how your example of France proves my argument wrong.

[–] UsernameHere -2 points 1 year ago (10 children)

Goals are nice. But we are talking about how to achieve an economic system that actually achieves this. Not just sets goals to.

You are claiming Communism and Socialism can do it but when I ask for an example you say they just haven’t done it yet.

If they have existed for centuries but haven’t achieved their goals yet what makes you think they can?

[–] UsernameHere -3 points 1 year ago (12 children)

There are still hierarchies in socialist economies. Thats why there is still disparity in socialist economies.

Do you have an example of one of these socialist societies where everyone has equal power?

[–] UsernameHere -3 points 1 year ago (14 children)

You can account for bad actors and power-seekers woth egalitarian distribution of power and a prevention against gaining in power.

How? Without stating how this is accomplished, you’re response is only really saying,

‘you can account for bad actors and power-seekers by living in a perfect world where bad people don’t exist’

If there were an economic system that achieved that it would be a utopia. I don’t know of any utopias on earth.

view more: ‹ prev next ›