16
submitted 1 week ago by alyaza@beehaw.org to c/citylife@beehaw.org
5
submitted 1 week ago by alyaza@beehaw.org to c/humanities@beehaw.org

While in recent years many European businesses have taken steps to alter their previously racist product designs, some games, especially board games like the popular Finnish Afrikan tähti (Star of Africa; Kuvataide, 1951), resist this trend. This raises two questions: First, what are the emotional mechanics which allow openly racist games like Afrikan tähti to remain unchanged and celebrated as ‘classics’ today? Secondly, what can our predominantly white board and role-playing game communities do to let go of emotional attachments to white supremacist games and become invested in a more respectful and welcoming games culture?

[...]we speculate on ways to expedite collective grief to help players reach what we term the ‘white acceptance stage’. We speculate that one useful design intervention to help rethink Afrikan tähti might be to classify it as a PEGI 18 game with the descriptor ‘discrimination’. Seen in this new light, the game might find a new purpose as a cultural educational item complementing lessons on Europe’s colonial past and the self-image of (Northern) Europe for older children. This intervention is inspired by the recent introduction of sensitivity warnings by multinational entertainment corporations such as Disney and broadcasting agencies like YLE (Rytsä, 2007). We argue that adopting such labeling practices for popular board games like Afrikan tähti can be a first step towards confronting racist and colonial ludic heritage.

38
submitted 1 week ago by alyaza@beehaw.org to c/politics@beehaw.org
5
submitted 1 week ago by alyaza@beehaw.org to c/feminism@beehaw.org
24
submitted 1 week ago by alyaza@beehaw.org to c/music@beehaw.org
10
submitted 1 week ago by alyaza@beehaw.org to c/humanities@beehaw.org

archive.is link

The U.S. has a near-infinite supply of clueless tourists such as myself, much to the dismay of our National Park Service. Yellowstone, our most famous national park thanks to Kevin Costner, welcomes 4.5 million of us each year. Like all of our parks, Yellowstone takes in tourists not only for the revenue but to remind them that the physical country they reside in is a marvel well beyond their comprehension. As such, Yellowstone is set up to accommodate these hordes. And while park officials do their best to keep tourists in line, often literally, my kind still manage to do plenty of tourist shit. We trample plant life. We get shitfaced and pick unwinnable fights with animals ten times our size. And we hurt ourselves. According to NPS data, at least 74 people have died while visiting Yellowstone in the past 15 years. I could have been one of those people. I deserve to be one of those people.

This is why Outside sent me to the park just a few weeks ago, during one of the busiest times of the year. They wanted me to observe our most basic tourists in the wild. Maybe I’d even get to see one die. Or, even better for my editors, maybe I would die while I was there. Maybe I’d look down my nose at the tourists around me only to end up as wolf food myself. Like most other Yellowstone visitors, I was not trained for the outdoors, I relish doing shit that posted signs yell at me not to do, and I often daydream about fighting bears (and winning!). I find danger tempting, which isn’t a good thing given that I can no longer swim a single pool lap without taking a break. Are people like me responsible enough to visit one of our national treasures without breaking it? Do we, as a population, know how to do national parks?

23
submitted 1 week ago by alyaza@beehaw.org to c/humanities@beehaw.org
10
submitted 1 week ago by alyaza@beehaw.org to c/usnews@beehaw.org

Emily Gedeon, a spokesperson for Denver's climate office, said there's no foul play at work here — just enormous demand. About 17,000 people tried to get a voucher on Tuesday, she told us, more than 77 times the amount available [220 vouchers]

81
submitted 1 week ago by alyaza@beehaw.org to c/lgbtq_plus@beehaw.org
14
submitted 1 week ago by alyaza@beehaw.org to c/literature@beehaw.org
5
12
submitted 1 week ago by alyaza@beehaw.org to c/citylife@beehaw.org

Published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, the study analyzed data collected among riders in three metropolitan regions — the San Francisco Bay Area, San Diego, and Los Angeles and Orange counties — between Nov. 2018 and Nov. 2019. The data set consisted of 7,333 ride-hailing trips by 2,458 respondents.

About 47% of the trips replaced a public transit, carpool, walking or cycling trip. An additional 5.8% of trips represented “induced travel,” meaning the person would not have made the trip were an Uber or Lyft unavailable. This suggests ride-hailing often tends to replace most sustainable transportation modes and leads to additional vehicle miles traveled.

[-] alyaza@beehaw.org 42 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Google "Search Liaison" Danny Sullivan confirmed the feature removal in an X post, saying the feature "was meant for helping people access pages when way back, you often couldn't depend on a page loading. These days, things have greatly improved. So, it was decided to retire it."

okay but... has it? this seems like an unfounded premise, intuitively speaking

[-] alyaza@beehaw.org 47 points 7 months ago

i think it's very clear now that the lack of unionization in the gaming industry will need to change, or every year or two or whatever arbitrary interval we'll see an astronomical number of people losing their jobs all at once in this way.

[-] alyaza@beehaw.org 53 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

"in New Hampshire" is the important caveat here, and this is an outlier-low for Trump poll too. nationally she continues to poll anywhere from 30 to 50 points behind him, and in any case it's not a given that "winning New Hampshire" is capable of catapulting her to victory with a Republican electorate that clearly likes Trump a lot

[-] alyaza@beehaw.org 47 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

i mean. what is the right way to deal with a dude whose entire career is literally built on flagrant stealing, plagiarism, and copyright infringement but whose circumstances make it so that it's nearly impossible to bring him to a court of law and, even if you did, whose finances and job make it exceedingly unlikely he will ever be able to financially remedy the damages he's done to said people?

[-] alyaza@beehaw.org 55 points 9 months ago

in general, there's a lack of media coverage of comments like this outside of the partisan blogs--which is absurd to me, since this is the most explicitly fascist Trump has been. the debate over whether he is one is basically over in my view.

[-] alyaza@beehaw.org 43 points 11 months ago

when they bought out Mediatonic they acquired the publishing rights, which is allegedly when he stopped getting royalty payments here. it also changed what platforms you can get the game on--previously it was available on a few other platforms--but these days you can only get the game on Epic or Steam

[-] alyaza@beehaw.org 52 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

FYI replace “blacklist” with “deny list” and “whitelist” with “allow list”.

this is the verbiage used by Lemmy which is why it's used here but also, speaking as a black person: i really don't care at all about the terminology used for this. it's like 2,000th on the list of important things that affect my life. even granting that it was more important: i certainly do not care about the "correct" term to use in this context, where it is a completely irrelevant and unimportant detail and talking about it in any way detracts from actually important conversations. please don't do this, thanks.

[-] alyaza@beehaw.org 55 points 1 year ago

past four months of data, for anyone wondering. a wiki page for this should be forthcoming in the days to come

June July August September
Contributions $705.00 $3,870.44 $1,310.90 $1,033.82
Expenses $54.00 $566.98 $523.79 $264.50
Difference +$651.00 +$3,303.46 +$787.11 +$769.32
Balance $726.51 $3,591.33 $4,347.79 $4,701.66
[-] alyaza@beehaw.org 47 points 1 year ago

What is your intent with a comment like this?

they were being quite literal [i got their donation email :)]

[-] alyaza@beehaw.org 47 points 1 year ago

this is the latest in a series of abrasive, unproductive, and generally uninteresting driveby comments from you--i think it's time for a week off.

[-] alyaza@beehaw.org 44 points 1 year ago

Not specifically about podcasts, but I think there’s a minority (?) of privacy/security enthusiasts who are pretty overtly right-wing libertarians, often because those technologies are anti-establishment.

yeah--the "techno-libertarians", as i've personally taken to calling them. that tendency was also the case on reddit in the early days (and to some extent still influences the site's cultural lean) and seems to be particularly common among stereotypical Silicon Valley types. a big calling card of that group is usually waxing poetic about the need to preserve almost unfiltered freedom of speech even though no website trying to preserve that has ever gone well.

[-] alyaza@beehaw.org 50 points 1 year ago

doing some housekeeping this afternoon and yes we have already decided to do this. (if it hasn't been done yet it will shortly, but someone besides me is going to be doing it)

view more: ‹ prev next ›

alyaza

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF