No, because "benevolent dictatorship" can't exist (the only benevolent action of such a dictatorship would be self-abolishment).
Looks pretty good compared to the typical fare on r/kitchencels.
I have no idea what "classic literature" this refers to?
Even 'labor' is a bit of a giveaway, IMO. Still funny tho
It's been moved to the archive but is linked on top of the talk page:
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=&oldid=1310806574#Including_the_video / https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Killing_of_Charlie_Kirk/Archive_2#Including_the_video
Looks like they've decided against inclusion. It's also unlikely the video meets "fair use" standards so they'd have to delete it anyway...
They had a whole edit war about whether it should be included and locked the article.
Kirk's killer seems to have used some large calibre weapon which probably made it look so particularly brutal and bloody.
Yeah, you could keep usual moderators as the basis and ultimate arbiters, but it would be, at the very least, interesting to try your approach. E.g., anyone can check the mod queue and be randomly assigned to moderate a recently reported post, and to avoid abuse or mistakes it could require 2 or 3 people agreeing on how to resolve something.
This you?
Already locked due to an edit war over whether to include the recording in the infobox 🙄
Because of this part: