121
submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by antonim@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/asklemmy@lemmy.world

Quite frequently I come across scanned books that are viewable for free online. For example, the publisher put them there (such as preview chapters), a library (old books from their collection that are in public domain), etc. Since I like hoarding data, and the online viewers that are used to present the book to me might not be very practical, I frequently try to download the books one way or another. This requires toying with the "inspect element" tool and various other methods of getting the images/PDF. Now, all that I access is what is, well, accessible; I don't hack into the servers or something. But - the stuff is meant to be hidden from the normal user. Does that act of hiding the material, no matter how primitive and easily circumvented, mean that I'm not allowed to access it at all?

I suppose ripping a public domain book is no big deal, but would books under copyright fare differently?

Mainly I'm asking out of curiosity, I don't expect the police to come visit me for ripping a 16th century dictionary.

Note: I live in EU, but I'd be curious to hear how this is treated elsewhere too.

Edit: I also remembered a funny trick I noticed on one site - it allows viewing PDFs on their website, but not downloading, unless you pay for the PDF. But when you load the page, even without paying, the PDF is already downloaded onto your computer and can be found in the browser cache. Is it legal to simply save the file that is already on your computer?

263
Mount and Blade: Rulerold (lemmy.dbzer0.com)
[-] antonim@lemmy.dbzer0.com 57 points 1 week ago

8 hours of work, 8 hours of sleep, 48 hours of Family Guy

153
rule (lemmy.dbzer0.com)
241
570
Libgen is back online (lemmy.dbzer0.com)
762
aristocratic death rule (lemmy.dbzer0.com)
18
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) by antonim@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/opensource@lemmy.ml

(I don't know where else to post, maybe someone here can help, and Neocities is open source...)

I want to create a site on Neocities. I fill out the signup form, solve the captcha, but when I click the "Create My Site" button, nothing happens. I click it again, and after a delay it starts loading something, but then just says "The captcha was not valid, please try again."

This happens regardless of the browser, machine or IP address I'm using.

Does anyone have any idea what might be the problem, and hopefully how to solve it? Is it just me or does anyone else have the same issue? I've sent an email to the admins two days ago, but still have gotten no reply, and I can find no info on this elsewhere online.

EDIT (20-8-2024): It's working now, probably they fixed it, woo! :D

[-] antonim@lemmy.dbzer0.com 123 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Absolutely the correct stance, nothing dirty about it. At this point, for better and for worse, the Internet is a basic necessity. Imagine having your water turned off because you threw water balloons at your neighbour.

[-] antonim@lemmy.dbzer0.com 67 points 1 month ago

every post war consensus policy in regards to collectivizing power from the wealthy and redistributing to everyone else

Am I reading this pretentious word salad right? Is this guy saying that communism has been the political consensus in the US since the fucking WW2?

And by god is he trying to show off he has read two or three books in his life with that vocabulary.

255
rule (lemmy.dbzer0.com)
196
step-rule (lemmy.dbzer0.com)
submitted 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) by antonim@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/196@lemmy.blahaj.zone
207
rule.io (lemmy.dbzer0.com)
110
rulespeed you (lemmy.dbzer0.com)
[-] antonim@lemmy.dbzer0.com 51 points 5 months ago

Why of course, I sure can't wait until Israelis genocide Palestinians and finally make the region way more LGBT-friendly, God bless. 🫡

I do have to wonder what do people who claim things like these think of LGBTs who participate in right-wing political parties in the west. Are they bothered by such hypocrisy too?

[-] antonim@lemmy.dbzer0.com 86 points 5 months ago

Some of these have to be trolling.

94
zer0 books rule (lemmy.dbzer0.com)
submitted 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) by antonim@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/196@lemmy.blahaj.zone
[-] antonim@lemmy.dbzer0.com 218 points 7 months ago

At this point I'm impressed by how much effort Twitter devs must've have put into making the site shittier and less accessible.

[-] antonim@lemmy.dbzer0.com 150 points 8 months ago

For anyone who can't find them... :D

[-] antonim@lemmy.dbzer0.com 89 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Damn, how did I even manage to miss that Simple apps have been bought off? I've used them for years and am still subscribed to the reddit community...

Some people suggest the action could possibly be deemed illegal, by breaking the licence the project was made under.

https://github.com/SimpleMobileTools/General-Discussion/issues/241#issuecomment-1837452672 - the dev's explanation, and replies which discuss the legal issues

https://old.reddit.com/r/fossdroid/comments/1893j2p/simple_mobile_tools_is_about_to_be_acquired/

[-] antonim@lemmy.dbzer0.com 83 points 8 months ago

I do have to admit it's a bit disheartening to post that pic, and then people react to it by looking how to use the objects to 'hack' the nature of reality.

[-] antonim@lemmy.dbzer0.com 130 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

The last part of your comment sounds like an ad straight out of those overlong YT videos.

[-] antonim@lemmy.dbzer0.com 56 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

The last one is not the Firefox logo, but the general Mozilla Foundation logo.

Source: literally just looking at the icon on your desktop.

I know I shouldn't be the one to nitpick because I posted a similar "design simplification bad" meme myself just yesterday, but still... :D

[-] antonim@lemmy.dbzer0.com 61 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

They don't really believe Russia is socialist to any degree, they just support it because it (supposedly) opposes the western hegemony, USA/NATO, etc.

Basically the same logic as that of pro-Russian right-wingers.

view more: next ›

antonim

joined 1 year ago