bignose

joined 4 months ago
[–] bignose@aussie.zone 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

No. That is one question they ask. It is not how they define intimate partner violence.

The definition they use is right there in the report:

What is intimate partner violence? In this research, we adopt the definition of intimate partner violence set out in the National Plan as:

Any behaviour within an intimate relationship (including current or past marriages, domestic partnerships or dates) that causes physical, sexual or psychological harm ... Intimate partner violence can occur outside of a domestic setting, such as in public, and between 2 people that do not live together. (DSS, 2022, p 37)

So if the behaviour does not (my emphasis) “cause physical, sexual or psychological harm”, it does not match their definition of intimate partner violence.

 

We accept reports where people consider a business is doing something they shouldn’t. We use the reports to inform our education, compliance and enforcement work.

  • When a business sells a product or service that doesn’t meet basic rights, known as consumer guarantees, it must offer the consumer a solution.
  • Businesses must not tell consumers to take the problem to the manufacturer or importer.
  • When a product has a major problem, consumers can choose between a refund or replacement.
  • When a service has a major problem, consumers have a right to alter their agreement with the service provider.
  • Businesses must fix a minor problem with a product or service by at least giving a free repair.