By that logic, Firefox would be in the same boat. After initially installing, you have to turn off data collection in the settings and disable Pocket in the config.

Because it allows banks to lend out money they don't have and when the banks lobby hard enough to completely remove whats left of the gold standard, the sky's the limit for lending out money. Creating money out of thin air increases inflation. However, in a weird way it impoverishes the lower classes while inriching the elite class because the latter tends to better connected and therefor closer to the "monetary spigot". This allows the elite class to buy up everything(land, companies, lobby/bribe governments)from the top down like a game of pacman.

so forcing us to watch them feels like a huge overstep.

We live in a fascist society so I wouldn't be suprised of their audacity..

If it's not open source and its tacked on to Chromium which is already bloated, why compare it to Firefox?

Tutanota encrypts the subject title while ProtonMail does not. I think it's because they use OpenPGP for compatibility with other email services, but it doesn't support that feature.

But boy howdy am I still waiting on some real basic features in some of theirapps.

Like split tunneling for their Linux VPN client.

Yeah this whole comment thread is not very reassuring about Lemmy and reveals it's just as vulnerable to manipulation. The r/Privacy thread on Reddit was far more honest.

I imagine some sort of autocomplete feature could be made which provides a dropdown menu of communities and instances based on what you type after "/c/".

Going to need support for wiki pages first.

Sorry for my ignorance but why would it be a nightmare to implement over Activitypub? Would there be an issue with approved editor accounts from other instances?

I don't know if I would consider wiki pages the threshold for feature creep. It's been a basic feature for Reddit mods ever since I joined Reddit 10 years ago. Therefore it existed before all the new.Reddit features were thrown in. Mods use wikis for directories, tutorials, archiving select content, and bot configs. Yes you could link to external wiki pages but IMO the experience for reading, editing, and adjusting settings would not be as seemless.

Sorry but I fail to see why support for wikis would be synonymous with corporate social media. IMHO, it's a fundamental tool to have.

For the first option you mentioned, a user already suggested a service called Hubziller. My issue with it is it might be a bit tacky or confusing for readers if they subscribe to a community but have to visit a separate service to access wikis, instead of making them in house. Maybe it's just me being stubborn and not thinking outside the box since I've been a mod on Reddiy for 10 years, but that's my humble opinion.

The second option is a more practical solution for here and now but it doesn't allow for collective editing or reverting changes.

Experienced mods moving from Reddit to Lemmy would expect support for integrated wiki pages since it's been a basic feature for so long. They use them for creating directories, tutorials, and all kinds of resources. My sense is that making wikis a separate project on the Fediverse would be too clunky, although I admit it's an interesting idea.

EDIT: They can also be used for bot configs just like AutoMod, which is a separate feature request in itself.