[-] coherent_rambling@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Topaz does a really nice job on the noise, and it's very noticeable in the fur.

I'd like to see the whole image be quite a bit brighter, personally. It's really hard to see the detail in this.

[-] coherent_rambling@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

If my 2015 Mustang GT (base 6MT, non performance-pack) got t-boned by a dump truck tomorrow, I'd buy another 2015-2017 Mustang GT base. I might try to find a Premium. The 2018-2023 looks a bit better, can have active exhaust, and has marginally more power, but they screwed up the manual gear ratios; it's viable in automatic.

It's fast, loud, comfortable, surprisingly economical, and has a big trunk. It's not really a sports car (hence omitting the performance pack), but it's a damn fine grand tourer and a very livable daily driver.

I've tried a lot of the other options, for durations ranging from a test drive to a few years.

  • Hot hatches are fun if you drive like an asshole but don't feel special if you drive them normally. Some people love that aspect, but personally I think it makes them boring too often.
  • The GR86 is an absolute riot if you live near twisty roads and punishing if you don't.
  • Corvettes feel huge and unwieldy in traffic even though they're not that big. The lack of even token back seats makes them a lot harder to live with, too.
  • Camaros have lousy visibility.
  • The Challenger drives like a moderately-quick truck.
  • Kia dealers treat the Stinger like it's a Ferrari, so good luck buying a new one.
  • The WRX is still decent, but I think it also suffers from the hot hatch syndrome where it only feels special when you drive it hard.
  • I haven't driven a Z. My instinct is that it'll be years before the price gets reasonable on a new one, but the old models might be fun if you don't need back seats.
  • I haven't driven a GR Corolla. No idea if it'll have the hot hatch problem or not, but I can't find one to try anyway.
[-] coherent_rambling@lemmy.world 31 points 1 year ago

Yes, that's literally true (or was before the Russian army visited). The ambient radiation in the Chernobyl Exclusion Zone, which is all you'd see on a map, is only slightly elevated. The main risk there is of disturbing the ground or abandoned debris and exposing much more dangerous material buried just below the surface.

3
Snail on concrete (lemmy.world)
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by coherent_rambling@lemmy.world to c/macrophotography@lemmy.world

Shot and tweaked on a Pixel 6 Pro at 4x (nominally around 100mm, but in macro situations it actually upscales from the main 24mm equivalent lens, not the 103mm periscope telephoto)

coherent_rambling

joined 1 year ago